Oukitel C69 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Phone Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and affordability, the Oukitel C69 emerges as the winner. Its impressive 65:08h endurance significantly outweighs the Cat S62 Pro’s reliance on an older chipset. However, users needing a more responsive experience for demanding apps will find the S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 preferable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C69 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83 x 9.5 mm (6.94 x 3.27 x 0.37 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 243 g (8.57 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 127.3 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Single | 64 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2", AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Purple, Green, Black | Black |
| Price | $ 116.43 / £ 109.99 / € 129.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel C69
- Exceptional battery life (65:08h endurance)
- More efficient chipset (Unisoc T615, 12nm)
- Potentially better value for money
- Performance may lag behind the Snapdragon 660 in demanding tasks
- Display specifications are unknown and likely basic
Cat S62 Pro
- Proven Snapdragon 660 chipset offers reliable performance
- Potentially better app compatibility due to Qualcomm’s wider support
- May have slightly better display quality
- Less efficient chipset (Snapdragon 660, 14nm)
- Significantly shorter battery life expected
- Likely higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the C69’s focus on value, it likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The S62 Pro, being a slightly higher-tier device, *may* feature improved color accuracy or brightness. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests neither phone is targeting display-centric users.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a detailed comparison is impossible. However, the rugged phone segment often prioritizes durability over camera quality. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature functional, but not exceptional, camera systems. The absence of information suggests neither device is a standout performer in photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel C69’s Unisoc T615 (12nm) utilizes a mix of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, offering a balance of performance and efficiency. The Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm), while older, features Kryo 260 cores designed for sustained performance. The 14nm process of the Snapdragon 660 is less efficient than the 12nm process of the Unisoc T615, potentially leading to higher power consumption under load. The Snapdragon 660’s higher clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz) suggest a performance advantage in tasks that fully utilize all cores, but the Unisoc T615’s architecture may offer better multi-tasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C69’s 65:08h endurance is its defining feature. This suggests a large battery capacity coupled with efficient power management. The Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset will likely result in significantly shorter battery life. The C69’s 18W charging is standard, while the S62 Pro’s charging speed is also unspecified. The C69’s longevity is a clear advantage for users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C69 if you need a phone that can reliably last through extended outdoor adventures, work trips, or simply want to minimize charging frequency. It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery life and value over peak performance. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a device with a proven chipset, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance, and require a more consistently smooth experience with moderately demanding applications.