Oukitel C65 vs. Ulefone Armor 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Oukitel C65 emerges as the winner. Its impressive 55:29h endurance significantly outweighs the Armor 8 Pro’s slightly faster charging, making it ideal for extended use away from power outlets. However, users needing more processing power will prefer the Armor 8 Pro.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C65 | Ulefone Armor 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2021, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2021, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.5 x 8.7 mm (6.57 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 166 x 81.8 x 15 mm (6.54 x 3.22 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 282 g (9.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | CTC Glass, Mohs level 4 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~67.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 430 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.5", AF | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5580 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gold, Green, Purple, White | Black, Orange, Red |
| Price | - | About 190 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 55:29h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel C65
- Exceptional battery life (55:29h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- Efficient Unisoc T606 chipset
- Slower charging speed (10W)
- Potentially lower performance compared to the Armor 8 Pro
Ulefone Armor 8 Pro
- More powerful Helio P60 chipset
- Faster charging (15W)
- Potentially smoother multitasking
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Likely lower battery lifespan compared to the C65
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on efficiency over graphical prowess, and therefore, display technology isn't a primary differentiator. Details regarding panel type, resolution, and brightness are absent, but given the price points, expect IPS LCD panels. The focus here is on durability, not visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, but the quality will heavily depend on sensor size and image processing. Given the market segment, expect primary sensors around 12-13MP. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 8 Pro’s Mediatek Helio P60, featuring four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Oukitel C65’s Unisoc T606. The A73 cores are more powerful than the C65’s Cortex-A75 cores, translating to snappier application loading and smoother multitasking. While the T606’s Cortex-A75 cores are efficient, the P60’s broader core count and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable performance boost. However, the T606’s newer architecture may offer slightly better efficiency in less demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C65’s standout feature is its exceptional 55:29h endurance. This is a significant advantage over what we’d expect from a phone with a similar capacity battery, indicating excellent software optimization and power management. The Ulefone Armor 8 Pro offers 15W wired charging, a slight improvement over the C65’s 10W charging, but this difference is unlikely to offset the C65’s vastly superior battery life. The C65’s 1000 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C65 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and your usage primarily involves communication, navigation, and light media consumption. It’s perfect for outdoor workers, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves without access to charging. Buy the Ulefone Armor 8 Pro if you prioritize a more responsive user experience for tasks like multitasking, gaming, or running demanding applications, and are willing to compromise slightly on ultimate battery life.