Oukitel C65 vs. Doogee S96 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and a lower price point, the Oukitel C65 is the clear winner. However, users who demand more responsive performance for gaming or demanding applications will find the Doogee S96 Pro’s Helio G90 chipset a worthwhile upgrade.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C65 | Doogee S96 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2020, October 26. Released 2020, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.5 x 8.7 mm (6.57 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 167 x 81.4 x 15.5 mm (6.57 x 3.20 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | CTC Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~71.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 430 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/2.8, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.5", AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 24W wired 10W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | 6350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gold, Green, Purple, White | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 280 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 55:29h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel C65
- Exceptional battery endurance (55:29h)
- Long-term battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Slower charging speed (10W)
Doogee S96 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G90)
- Faster charging (24W wired, 10W wireless)
- Potentially better camera performance
- Likely shorter battery life compared to Oukitel C65
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price point of the Oukitel C65, it likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The Doogee S96 Pro, positioned slightly higher in the market, may incorporate a more advanced panel, potentially with improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of details like resolution and refresh rate makes a definitive assessment impossible, but the S96 Pro’s chipset suggests it *could* support a higher refresh rate display if implemented.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is challenging. However, the chipset difference hints at superior image processing capabilities within the Doogee S96 Pro. The Helio G90 typically supports more advanced camera features and faster image processing speeds. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the S96 Pro’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will likely deliver better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. It’s reasonable to assume the S96 Pro will offer a more versatile and capable camera system.
Performance
The Doogee S96 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G90 chipset represents a significant performance leap over the Oukitel C65’s Unisoc T606. The G90 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz versus the C65’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz – resulting in noticeably faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The G90’s GPU is also substantially more powerful, making it the better choice for mobile gaming. While both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G90 translate to a more responsive user experience. The Unisoc T606 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C65 boasts an impressive 55:29h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. This is likely achieved through a combination of a large battery capacity (unspecified) and the power efficiency of the Unisoc T606 chipset. The Doogee S96 Pro, while lacking a specific endurance rating, compensates with significantly faster charging – 24W wired and 10W wireless – compared to the C65’s 10W wired charging. The S96 Pro’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups, mitigating the impact of potentially lower battery endurance. The C65’s 1000 charge cycle claim also suggests a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C65 if you need a phone that can reliably last through extended periods without access to a charger, and if your primary use cases revolve around communication, basic productivity, and media consumption. Buy the Doogee S96 Pro if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the convenience of faster wired and wireless charging.