Oukitel C62 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 13: A Deep Dive into Rugged Endurance and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity above all else, the Oukitel C62 is the clear winner. Its astounding battery endurance and 1000-cycle lifespan outweigh the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s performance advantage for typical daily use. However, the Power Armor 13 is the better choice for those needing more processing power for gaming or demanding applications.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C62 | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 170.7 x 79.6 x 9.5 mm (6.72 x 3.13 x 0.37 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | HKC Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2 (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black, Blue, Pink | Black |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 47:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel C62
- Exceptional battery life (47.5h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Potentially lower cost due to simpler hardware
- Slower processor (Unisoc T606)
- Slow charging speed (10W wired)
- Display brightness data unavailable
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Faster processor (Helio G95)
- Faster charging (33W wired, 15W wireless)
- Brighter display (401 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (296h endurance)
- Higher price likely due to more powerful hardware
- No stated battery cycle lifespan
Display Comparison
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 boasts a measured peak brightness of 401 nits, a significant advantage over the Oukitel C62 (brightness data unavailable). Both displays share a 1306:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels and color depth. However, without knowing the panel technology used in the C62, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles. The brighter display on the Power Armor 13 will be noticeably better in direct sunlight, making it more practical for outdoor work or recreation.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This suggests both are likely to offer a standard camera experience for the price point. Without further information, it’s impossible to determine which device captures superior images. The absence of details also implies neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The 2MP macro cameras commonly found in this segment are unlikely to provide significant detail or utility on either device.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 13’s Mediatek Helio G95 chipset, featuring a 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, represents a substantial performance leap over the Oukitel C62’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The G95’s newer CPU architecture and higher clock speeds translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. While both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, the G95’s superior design provides a clear advantage. The C62 will handle basic tasks adequately, but the Power Armor 13 is the better choice for demanding users.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C62’s 47.5-hour endurance rating is the standout feature, dwarfing the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s 296-hour rating. This translates to potentially days of use on a single charge for the C62, making it ideal for travelers or those frequently away from power outlets. The Power Armor 13 compensates with significantly faster charging: 33W wired, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless, compared to the C62’s 10W wired charging. This means the Power Armor 13 can quickly top up its battery, while the C62 requires a much longer charging time. The C62 also claims a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, suggesting greater long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C62 if you need a phone that will reliably last for days on a single charge, are a light user who primarily uses communication apps, and value long-term battery health. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming or multitasking, appreciate the convenience of fast and wireless charging, and require a brighter display for outdoor visibility.