Oukitel C62 Pro vs. Ulefone Power Armor 13: A Deep Dive into Rugged Endurance and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained uptime and value, the Oukitel C62 Pro emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 47:30h endurance rating significantly surpasses the Ulefone’s 296h, making it ideal for extended off-grid use. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 is the better choice for those needing more processing power and faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C62 Pro | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 170.7 x 79.6 x 9.5 mm (6.72 x 3.13 x 0.37 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | HKC Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2 (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black, Blue, Pink | Black |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 47:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel C62 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (47:30h endurance)
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term reliability
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Limited camera specifications
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Faster and more powerful Helio G95 processor
- 33W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Significantly shorter battery life (296h endurance)
- Higher price point (likely)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1306:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 boasts a measured peak brightness of 401 nits, a significant advantage over the unstated brightness of the Oukitel C62 Pro. This higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels given the price points, the Ulefone’s superior brightness makes it the more practical choice for outdoor workers.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the market segment, we can assume both feature basic camera setups. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s likely inclusion of more advanced image processing features, common in Mediatek-powered devices, may result in slightly better image quality. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Ulefone, while unconfirmed, would further enhance its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 13’s Mediatek Helio G95 chipset, featuring a 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, represents a substantial performance leap over the Oukitel C62 Pro’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The Helio G95’s Cortex-A76 cores offer significantly improved single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness and smoother multitasking. The 12nm fabrication process is shared, but the architectural improvements in the Helio G95 provide a noticeable advantage. This difference will be most apparent when running graphically intensive games or demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C62 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional 47:30h endurance rating, achieved with a battery size not explicitly stated but optimized for longevity. This dwarfs the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s 296h endurance. However, the Ulefone compensates with significantly faster charging: 33W wired, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless charging. The Oukitel is limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. The Ulefone’s wireless charging capabilities add convenience, while the reverse wireless charging can be used to top up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C62 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. It's perfect for travelers, field workers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you prioritize a smoother user experience with more demanding apps, faster charging speeds (including wireless), and a more responsive overall system, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.