The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific need: durability. However, within this niche, priorities diverge. The Oukitel C59 emphasizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Cat S62 Pro leans towards a more powerful, albeit older, chipset. This comparison dissects these trade-offs, helping you determine which phone best suits your demanding lifestyle.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and cost-effectiveness, the Oukitel C59 is the clear winner. Its 84:47h endurance significantly outpaces what the Cat S62 Pro can offer. However, users needing more responsive performance for demanding apps will find the Cat S62 Pro's Snapdragon 660 a better fit.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 05 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 171.2 x 77.8 x 13.4 mm (6.74 x 3.06 x 0.53 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 293 g (10.34 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| | - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m
MIL-STD-810H compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | HKC Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 10000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Purple, Blue, Grey | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 84:47h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel C59
- Exceptional battery life (84:47h endurance)
- More efficient chipset (Unisoc T606 12nm)
- Long battery lifespan (1200 charge cycles)
- Likely more affordable price point
- Slower processor compared to Snapdragon 660
- Potentially lower quality display
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Cat S62 Pro
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Smoother multitasking and app performance
- Likely better camera quality
- Potentially higher quality display
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Less efficient chipset (Snapdragon 660 14nm)
- Potentially more thermal throttling
- Likely higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's positioning as a more premium device, it likely features a higher quality panel with better color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness. The Oukitel C59, focusing on value, likely utilizes a more cost-effective display solution. Bezels are expected to be larger on the C59, reflecting its budget-friendly nature.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Cat S62 Pro, being a higher-tier device, likely features a more capable main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Oukitel C59 likely relies on software processing to compensate for a potentially less advanced sensor. It's reasonable to assume the S62 Pro will deliver better image quality in low-light conditions and more detailed photos overall. We can expect both phones to include a variety of shooting modes, but the S62 Pro's image processing pipeline will likely be more refined.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cat S62 Pro's Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) boasts a faster CPU clock speed (2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold vs 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 on the Oukitel), and a more sophisticated core configuration. This translates to noticeably quicker app launches and smoother multitasking. However, the Unisoc T606 (12nm) in the Oukitel C59 benefits from a newer, more efficient manufacturing process. While individually slower, the T606's efficiency contributes significantly to the C59's exceptional battery life. The Snapdragon 660, being older, will likely exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C59's standout feature is its incredible 84:47h endurance. This is a direct result of the efficient Unisoc T606 chipset and likely a larger battery capacity (though not specified). The Cat S62 Pro, while offering respectable battery life, cannot compete with this level of longevity. The C59's 18W charging is adequate, but slower than what some competitors offer. The S62 Pro's charging speed is not specified, but is likely similar or slightly faster. The C59's 1200 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C59 if you need a phone that can reliably last through extended outdoor adventures, work trips without access to power, or simply prefer the peace of mind of multi-day battery life. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive experience when running resource-intensive applications, even at the cost of battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oukitel C59 struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Unisoc T606 is not a gaming powerhouse. While it can handle less demanding titles, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings and accept lower frame rates in games like PUBG or Call of Duty. The Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro will provide a smoother gaming experience, though it's also not a flagship-level performer.
❓ How does the efficiency of the Unisoc T606 impact the long-term usability of the Oukitel C59?
The 12nm process node of the Unisoc T606 contributes significantly to the C59's exceptional battery life. This efficiency also means the phone will generate less heat under load, potentially extending the lifespan of internal components and reducing battery degradation over time. The 1200 charge cycles further reinforce this longevity.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro still a relevant chipset in 2024?
While the Snapdragon 660 is an older chipset, it remains capable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication. However, it will show its age when compared to newer chipsets in terms of raw processing power and graphics performance. It's a solid performer for its age, but not a future-proof choice.
