Oukitel C59 vs. Blackview BV9900E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and minimizing charging frequency, the Oukitel C59 is the clear winner. Its 84:47h endurance significantly outpaces the BV9900E. However, users needing more processing power for gaming or demanding applications will find the Blackview BV9900E a better fit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C59 | Blackview BV9900E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2020, September 10. Released 2020, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 05 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 171.2 x 77.8 x 13.4 mm (6.74 x 3.06 x 0.53 in) | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm (6.16 x 3.08 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 293 g (10.34 oz) | 273 g (9.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | HKC Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.84 inches, 85.1 cm2 (~69.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V/CE Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 16 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired 18W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10000 mAh | 4380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Purple, Blue, Grey | Black, Silver |
| Price | - | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 84:47h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel C59
- Exceptional battery life (84:47h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1200 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Potentially slower app loading times
Blackview BV9900E
- More powerful Mediatek Helio P90 processor
- Wireless charging support (18W)
- Faster charging speeds (15W wired)
- Shorter battery life compared to Oukitel C59
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The BV9900E, being positioned slightly higher, may offer a marginally higher resolution or slightly better color accuracy. The absence of details like refresh rate or peak brightness suggests neither phone is targeting display-centric users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The BV9900E, given its slightly higher positioning, may have a larger primary sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility. Image quality will likely be acceptable for social media sharing, but neither phone is expected to compete with flagship camera performance.
Performance
The Blackview BV9900E’s Mediatek Helio P90 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) demonstrably outperforms the Oukitel C59’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The higher clock speeds of the P90’s Cortex-A75 cores translate to faster application loading and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, the P90’s architecture is more mature and optimized for performance. This difference will be most noticeable in graphically demanding games and video editing. The C59’s T606 is sufficient for everyday tasks, but will struggle with more intensive workloads.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C59’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 84:47 hours. This is significantly longer than what is typically achieved by phones in this price range. While the Blackview BV9900E’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 15W wired and 18W wireless charging capabilities offer more versatility. The C59’s 18W wired charging is adequate, but slower than the potential wireless charging speed of the BV9900E. The C59’s 1200 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C59 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and your primary use cases are communication, basic productivity, and media consumption. Buy the Blackview BV9900E if you prefer a more powerful processor for gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications, and are willing to compromise on battery life and potentially charge more frequently. The BV9900E also appeals to those who value the convenience of wireless charging.