Oukitel C58 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 13: A Deep Dive into Rugged Endurance and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and minimizing charging frequency, the Oukitel C58 is the clear winner thanks to its exceptional 47:30h endurance rating. However, those needing more processing power for gaming or demanding applications will find the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s Helio G95 a more suitable choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C58 | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.5 x 8.7 mm (6.57 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 430 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF other unspecified camera | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Black |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 47:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel C58
- Exceptional battery endurance (47:30h)
- High charge cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Slower charging speed (10W)
- Less powerful processor
- Limited display information
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Faster and more versatile charging (33W wired, 15W wireless)
- More powerful processor (Helio G95)
- Brighter display (401 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery endurance (296h)
- Potentially higher price point
- Limited camera details
Display Comparison
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 boasts a measured peak brightness of 401 nits, a significant advantage over the unmeasured brightness of the Oukitel C58. Both displays share a 1306:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels and color depth. However, without further data on the C58’s panel technology (like refresh rate or color gamut coverage), the Power Armor 13’s higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight. The lack of information on the C58’s display is a notable omission.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing information, a direct comparison is impossible. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a photography powerhouse. We can assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance is likely to be limited. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 13’s Mediatek Helio G95 chipset, featuring a 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, represents a substantial performance leap over the Oukitel C58’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The G95’s more modern CPU architecture and higher clock speeds will translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. While both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, the G95’s superior design provides a clear advantage. The C58 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Power Armor 13 is the better choice for power users.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C58’s standout feature is its incredible 47:30h endurance rating, supported by a claimed 1000 charge cycles. This dwarfs the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s 296h endurance. However, the Power Armor 13 compensates with significantly faster charging: 33W wired, 15W wireless, and even 5W reverse wireless charging. The C58 is limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. While the C58 wins on longevity, the Power Armor 13 offers convenience with its versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C58 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and your usage primarily revolves around communication, basic productivity, and media consumption. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and require faster charging capabilities, even if it means charging more frequently.