The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific need: durability. However, within this niche, priorities diverge. The Oukitel C58 emphasizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Cat S62 Pro leans towards a more powerful, albeit older, chipset. This comparison dissects these differing philosophies to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and cost-effectiveness, the Oukitel C58 is the clear winner. While the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 offers a performance edge, the C58’s superior endurance and 1000-cycle battery longevity provide a more practical benefit for those frequently away from a charger.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.5 x 8.7 mm (6.57 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| | - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m
MIL-STD-810H compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 430 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF
other unspecified camera | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Black |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 47:30h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel C58
- Exceptional battery endurance (47:30h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- More power-efficient chipset (Unisoc T606)
- Slower charging speed (10W)
- Less powerful CPU for demanding tasks
Cat S62 Pro
- More powerful CPU (Snapdragon 660)
- Smoother multitasking and app performance
- Potentially better camera system
- Lower battery endurance
- Less efficient chipset
- Likely shorter battery lifespan
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro’s positioning as a more premium device, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and potentially higher brightness. The Oukitel C58, focusing on value, likely utilizes a more cost-effective display solution. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests neither phone is targeting display-centric users.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs beyond the chipsets, a detailed comparison is impossible. However, the Cat S62 Pro, being a more expensive device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and better image processing capabilities. The Oukitel C58 will likely focus on providing a functional camera experience at a lower cost, potentially sacrificing low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of information suggests neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core with 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores – compared to the Oukitel C58’s Unisoc T606 (12nm) with 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Unisoc T606 benefits from a slightly newer, smaller 12nm process, the Snapdragon 660’s superior core clock speeds and architectural design translate to noticeably faster performance in demanding tasks. This means quicker app launches, smoother multitasking, and a better experience with graphically intensive applications on the Cat S62 Pro.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C58’s standout feature is its exceptional 47:30h endurance rating and 1000 charge cycles. This suggests a significantly longer usable battery life compared to the Cat S62 Pro, which lacks a specified endurance rating. The C58’s 10W charging is slow, but the longevity of the battery mitigates this. The Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro is known to be less power-efficient than the Unisoc T606, meaning it will drain the battery faster under similar usage conditions. The C58’s 1000-cycle rating also indicates a longer overall battery lifespan, reducing the need for replacement.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C58 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and your primary use cases involve everyday tasks like communication, navigation, and light media consumption. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and occasionally engage in more demanding applications, accepting the trade-off of reduced battery life and potentially shorter battery lifespan.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How does the Unisoc T606 chipset in the Oukitel C58 handle gaming compared to the Snapdragon 660?
The Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro will provide a noticeably smoother gaming experience, particularly with more demanding titles. While the Unisoc T606 can handle casual games, it will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings. Expect lower frame rates and potential stuttering on the Oukitel C58.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Oukitel C58 a significant drawback, considering its long battery life?
While 10W charging is slow, the Oukitel C58’s exceptional battery endurance and 1000-cycle lifespan mitigate this issue. You won’t need to charge it as frequently, and the battery will maintain its capacity for a longer period, reducing the impact of the slow charging speed. It's a trade-off for longevity.
❓ What type of user would benefit most from the Cat S62 Pro's Snapdragon 660 processor?
Users who frequently multitask between apps, edit photos or videos, or play graphically demanding games will benefit most from the Snapdragon 660. The increased processing power provides a smoother and more responsive experience for these tasks.
❓ Given the rugged nature of both phones, are there any differences in their build quality or certifications?
While specific build details aren't provided, Cat phones are generally known for adhering to stringent MIL-STD-810H and IP68/IP69K certifications, suggesting a higher level of durability. The Oukitel C58 likely meets basic rugged standards, but may not reach the same level of protection as the Cat S62 Pro.
