Oukitel C57 Pro vs. Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Battery and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Oukitel C57 Pro is the clear winner. Its impressive 41:35h endurance significantly outweighs the Armor 9E’s performance advantage, especially considering the C57 Pro’s more efficient chipset. However, users demanding more responsive multitasking and gaming should lean towards the Ulefone Armor 9E.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C57 Pro | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.6 x 9.4 mm (6.53 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 576 x 1280 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~215 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4300 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey, Blue, Purple, Gold | Black |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 41:35h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel C57 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (41:35h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- More efficient chipset for extended use
- Significantly lower processing power
- Likely limited gaming capabilities
- Potentially slower app loading times
Ulefone Armor 9E
- Faster processor (Helio P90) for smoother performance
- 18W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially more durable build (rugged design)
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Less efficient chipset
- May experience more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given the C57 Pro’s focus on value, it likely features a standard LCD panel. The Armor 9E, positioned as a more rugged device, may incorporate a slightly more durable display, but likely still within the budget segment. Without further data, assessing brightness, color accuracy, or refresh rates is impossible, but both will likely target the entry-level market.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications for both devices. Given the price points, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature modest camera systems. The Armor 9E, being a more 'feature-rich' device, *might* have a slightly more capable main sensor, but without details on megapixel count, aperture, or image stabilization, it’s difficult to say. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a marketing feature rather than a substantial photographic asset.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 9E’s Mediatek Helio P90 (12nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Oukitel C57 Pro’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The P90’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.2 GHz) deliver substantially higher peak performance than the C57 Pro’s Cortex-A55 cores (4x1.6 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz). This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 12nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling under sustained load. The C57 Pro’s chipset, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications. The Armor 9E is the clear choice for users who value responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C57 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional 41:35h endurance. This is a massive advantage over what we’d expect from a phone with the Helio P90. While the Ulefone Armor 9E offers 18W wired charging, allowing for quicker top-ups, it cannot compensate for the C57 Pro’s sheer longevity. The Unisoc SC9863A’s efficiency, combined with a likely larger battery capacity (though unspecified), allows the C57 Pro to operate for significantly longer on a single charge. The C57 Pro also boasts 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan before battery degradation.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C57 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through extended periods without access to a charger – ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who simply dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prioritize smoother application performance, occasional gaming, and appreciate the faster charging capabilities, even at the expense of battery longevity.