Oukitel caters to the rugged phone market with a range of devices, but the C51 and WP19 represent distinct approaches. The C51 prioritizes affordability, while the WP19 aims for a more robust performance profile. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which phone best suits your needs, balancing price with capability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oukitel WP19 is the superior choice. Its Helio G95 chipset offers a significant performance boost over the C51’s Unisoc T606, and the 33W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the C51 is cheaper, the WP19’s added power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2022, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2022, July |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 78.2 x 9.4 mm (6.62 x 3.08 x 0.37 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~258 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5" | 16 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 21000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Blue, Camo, Camouflage |
| Price | - | About 380 EUR |
Oukitel C51
- Most affordable option
- Rugged build quality
- Simple and easy to use
- Slow processor
- Slow charging speed
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Oukitel WP19
- Significantly faster processor
- Much faster charging (33W)
- Better gaming performance
- Higher price point
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
- May be slightly bulkier due to larger components
Display Comparison
Neither Oukitel provides detailed display specifications beyond basic resolution. However, the focus on ruggedness suggests both likely utilize IPS LCD panels for durability. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of brightness or color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both models, prioritizing screen protection over a modern, edge-to-edge design. The display is not a differentiating factor.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable, but given the price points, expectations should be tempered. Both phones likely feature a primary camera supplemented by auxiliary lenses of limited utility. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the WP19’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Helio G95 chipset *should* result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to provide significant photographic value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP19’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is a substantial upgrade over the C51’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The G95 features a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus the C51’s 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores – resulting in noticeably faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The G95’s GPU also provides a significant advantage for gaming. While both use a 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G95 translate to better sustained performance and potentially improved thermal management. The WP19 will handle graphically intensive games and apps with far greater ease.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the charging speed is a key differentiator. The Oukitel C51’s 10W charging is slow by modern standards, requiring several hours for a full charge. The WP19’s 33W charging is significantly faster, potentially reducing charge times by over 50%. While a larger battery capacity on the C51 might offer slightly longer runtime, the WP19’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, providing more usable uptime throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C51 if you need a basic, extremely affordable rugged phone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It’s ideal for users who prioritize durability above all else and don’t require demanding performance. Buy the Oukitel WP19 if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming, streaming, or multitasking, and value faster charging to minimize interruptions. This is the better option for users who actively use their phones throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G95 in the WP19 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Helio G95 is a capable chip, sustained gaming can generate heat. Oukitel’s rugged designs often incorporate heat dissipation features, but throttling is still possible. The WP19’s larger size may provide more surface area for heat dissipation compared to the C51, potentially mitigating throttling to some extent.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the C51 realistically usable for daily charging?
10W charging is quite slow in 2024. Expect a full charge to take several hours, making it best suited for overnight charging. Users who frequently need to top up their battery throughout the day will find the C51’s charging speed frustrating.
❓ Does the Oukitel WP19 support any form of fast charging protocols like Power Delivery?
Oukitel doesn't explicitly state support for Power Delivery. However, the 33W charging suggests it likely utilizes a proprietary fast charging protocol. Using a standard 5W charger will result in significantly slower charging speeds.
❓ How does the Unisoc T606 in the C51 handle basic multitasking like browsing and social media?
The Unisoc T606 is adequate for basic tasks. You can expect smooth performance with web browsing, social media, and messaging apps. However, opening multiple apps simultaneously or switching between them quickly may result in noticeable lag.
