The Oukitel C35 and Tecno Spark 10 Pro represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. Both aim to deliver essential features at a low price point, but they take slightly different approaches. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money, focusing on performance, battery life, and display quality.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Spark 10 Pro emerges as the better choice. While both phones share a similar CPU core configuration, the Tecno’s 18W charging and measured 521 nits of brightness provide a tangible advantage over the Oukitel C35’s slower 10W charging and unspecified display brightness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August | Available. Released 2023, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.4 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.36 in) | 168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, HIOS 12.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), AF
Secondary unspecified camera | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Light Blue | Starry Black, Pearl White |
| Models | - | KI7 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | £ 245.74 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1991:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 249938 (v9)
GeekBench: 1358 (v5.1), 1376 (v6)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oukitel C35
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery endurance (131h)
- Slow 10W charging
- Unspecified display brightness
- Unisoc chipset may offer slightly lower performance
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
- Faster 18W charging
- Brighter display (521 nits)
- MediaTek Helio G88 offers slightly better GPU performance
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera details are lacking
- Endurance rating is the same as the Oukitel
Display Comparison
The Tecno Spark 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 521 nits, a significant advantage over the Oukitel C35, which lacks published brightness data. Both displays share a 1991:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels and color depth. However, the higher brightness of the Tecno will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight, making it more usable outdoors. The lack of detailed display specifications for the Oukitel C35 makes a precise comparison difficult, but the Tecno clearly has the edge in this category.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This suggests both are likely to feature basic camera systems geared towards casual photography. The absence of information makes a meaningful comparison impossible. It's safe to assume neither phone will compete with higher-end devices in image quality, and the usefulness of any included macro cameras (often 2MP) is limited. The Tecno brand generally invests more in camera software, which *could* translate to better results, but this is speculative without further data.
Performance
Both the Oukitel C35 and Tecno Spark 10 Pro utilize an octa-core CPU configuration with the same core arrangement: 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. However, they differ in their chipsets – the Oukitel uses the Unisoc Tiger T616, while the Tecno employs the MediaTek Helio G88. While the core architecture is identical, the Helio G88 generally exhibits slightly better GPU performance, potentially leading to smoother gaming experiences. Both devices are likely to handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Tecno has a slight edge for more demanding applications. Neither chipset is known for exceptional thermal performance, so sustained heavy loads may result in throttling.
Battery Life
Both the Oukitel C35 and Tecno Spark 10 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Tecno Spark 10 Pro supports 18W wired charging, significantly faster than the Oukitel C35’s 10W charging. This means the Tecno will recharge much quicker, reducing downtime. While both phones offer comparable longevity, the faster charging speed of the Tecno is a practical advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C35 if your primary need is a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media, and you prioritize absolute lowest cost. Buy the Tecno Spark 10 Pro if you value faster charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a slightly more refined user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the MediaTek Helio G88 in the Tecno Spark 10 Pro capable of playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G88 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not a gaming-focused chipset, so don't expect high-end performance. The Oukitel C35 with the Unisoc T616 will likely offer a similar, but potentially slightly less smooth, gaming experience.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oukitel C35 with its 10W charger?
With a 10W charger, a full charge from 0% on the Oukitel C35 will likely take around 3-4 hours. This is considerably slower than the Tecno Spark 10 Pro's 18W charging, which can achieve a full charge in approximately 1.5-2 hours.
❓ Does the Tecno Spark 10 Pro support fast charging protocols beyond 18W?
While the Tecno Spark 10 Pro supports 18W charging, it's unlikely to benefit significantly from a charger with higher wattage. The phone's internal charging circuitry is designed to handle up to 18W, and using a more powerful charger won't necessarily result in faster charging times.
