The Oukitel C31 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A04s represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Oukitel aims for a balance of features at a very low price point, while the Samsung leverages brand recognition and a more refined software experience. This comparison dives deep into the hardware to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A04s is the better choice. While both phones offer similar battery endurance (114h), the Exynos 850 chipset, fabricated on an 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and improved efficiency over the Oukitel C31 Pro’s 12nm Helio P22.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 9.5 mm thickness | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Other unspecified cameras | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Purple, Black | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | About 110 EUR | € 133.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 145123(v9)
GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oukitel C31 Pro
- Lowest possible price point
- Acceptable battery life
- Functional for basic tasks
- Outdated and inefficient chipset
- Likely poor software support
- Subpar camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- More efficient Exynos 850 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Better brand reputation and software support
- Still a budget device with limitations
- 15W charging is relatively slow
- Camera quality is likely average
Display Comparison
Both the Oukitel C31 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A04s share a contrast ratio of 1614:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Samsung Galaxy A04s boasts a measured peak brightness of 389 nits, suggesting a more visible display in outdoor conditions. While neither phone is expected to have exceptional color accuracy, the A04s’ brighter panel provides a better viewing experience overall. Details regarding panel type (IPS vs TFT) are missing, but given the price point, both are likely IPS LCDs.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or resolution. Given the price bracket, image quality is unlikely to be a standout feature on either device. The Oukitel C31 Pro’s inclusion of a 2MP macro camera is likely a marketing tactic, as such low-resolution sensors rarely produce usable images. The Samsung Galaxy A04s likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially offering slightly better dynamic range and color reproduction, but detailed analysis is impossible without further specifications.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04s’ Exynos 850 chipset, built on an 8nm process, represents a significant architectural advantage over the Oukitel C31 Pro’s 12nm Mediatek Helio P22. The Exynos 850 utilizes a combination of four Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, offering improved single-core performance and efficiency compared to the Helio P22’s all-Cortex-A53 configuration. This translates to snappier app loading times and smoother multitasking on the A04s. While both CPUs are clocked at 2.0 GHz, the newer architecture and smaller fabrication node of the Exynos 850 provide a clear performance edge.
Battery Life
Both the Oukitel C31 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A04s achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Exynos 850’s 8nm fabrication process is more power-efficient than the Helio P22’s 12nm process. The Samsung Galaxy A04s supports 15W wired charging, which, while not fast, is a standard offering in this price range. Battery capacity details are missing for both devices, but the A04s’ more efficient chipset likely allows it to maintain its endurance rating with a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C31 Pro if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and are willing to compromise on performance and software polish. It’s a viable option for basic communication and light tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A04s if you prefer a smoother user experience, slightly better performance for everyday apps, and the backing of a well-established brand with a more reliable software update track record.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 in the Galaxy A04s get hot during extended use, like gaming?
The Exynos 850, built on an 8nm process, is relatively efficient and shouldn't exhibit significant overheating during moderate gaming sessions. While it's not a gaming powerhouse, it will handle less demanding titles without excessive throttling. The Oukitel C31 Pro's Helio P22 is more likely to throttle under load due to its less efficient 12nm process.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Oukitel C31 Pro actually useful for taking close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones produce images with limited detail and sharpness. The small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization result in blurry and noisy close-up shots. It's unlikely to deliver satisfying results for serious macro photography.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A04s handle popular games like PUBG Mobile at acceptable frame rates?
The Samsung Galaxy A04s can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a stable frame rate. Expect around 30-40 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive gaming. The Helio P22 in the Oukitel C31 Pro will struggle even more with PUBG Mobile.
