The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oukitel C2 and Infinix Smart 5 Pro both aim to deliver essential functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The C2 prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Smart 5 Pro opts for an octa-core processor. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Oukitel C2 is the clear winner. Its impressive 55:29h endurance rating significantly surpasses what the Infinix Smart 5 Pro can likely achieve. However, the Smart 5 Pro’s octa-core processor may offer a smoother experience for multitasking and moderately demanding apps.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Available. Released 2021, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.9 x 9.3 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Sharp glass, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 540 x 1200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~202 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T310 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 (Go edition), XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2 (wide), AF | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Purple, Blue, Black | Morandi Green, Heart of Ocean |
| Price | - | About 70 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 55:29h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel C2
- Exceptional battery life (55:29h endurance)
- More efficient 12nm Unisoc T310 chipset
- Potentially smoother performance due to Cortex-A75 core
- Quad-core processor may struggle with heavy multitasking
- Limited information on display quality
Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Octa-core processor for potentially better multitasking
- Lower price point (likely)
- Widely available
- Less efficient 28nm Unisoc SC9863A chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Lower individual core clock speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given their price points, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but rather on basic usability. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, and color accuracy will be standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, assessing image quality is difficult. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information suggests neither device will excel in low-light conditions or offer advanced features like optical image stabilization. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors present on either device should be considered supplementary and unlikely to deliver significant improvements in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel C2’s Unisoc T310, built on a more efficient 12nm process, features a quad-core configuration with a Cortex-A75 performance core alongside three Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This architecture aims for a balance between responsiveness and power savings. Conversely, the Infinix Smart 5 Pro utilizes the Unisoc SC9863A, fabricated on a less efficient 28nm node, and boasts an octa-core setup with four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6GHz and another four at 1.2GHz. While the Smart 5 Pro has more cores, the older, larger process node and lower individual core clock speeds suggest the T310 may offer comparable, or even superior, performance in many real-world scenarios. The T310’s A75 core provides a significant performance boost over the A55 cores found in the SC9863A.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C2’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 55:29 hours. This is a significant advantage over most smartphones in this price range. While the Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the less efficient Unisoc SC9863A chipset suggests it will require more frequent charging. Both devices support 10W wired charging, meaning charge times will be relatively slow – expect several hours to reach a full charge from empty.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C2 if you need a phone that can reliably last through extended periods without access to a charger – ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who simply dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Infinix Smart 5 Pro if you prioritize a potentially smoother multitasking experience and are willing to trade some battery life for the benefit of an octa-core processor, particularly if your usage involves light gaming or running multiple apps simultaneously.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oukitel C2 handle basic social media apps and web browsing without lag?
Yes, the Unisoc T310 chipset, with its Cortex-A75 performance core, is well-suited for everyday tasks like social media, web browsing, and messaging. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should provide a smooth and responsive experience for these common applications.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 5 Pro a good choice for playing mobile games?
The Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s octa-core processor *might* allow for some light gaming, but don't expect a high-performance experience. The Unisoc SC9863A is a budget chipset, and demanding games will likely run at low settings with noticeable frame rate drops. The 28nm process also means potential for thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either phone with the 10W charger?
With both phones utilizing 10W charging, expect a full charge from 0% to take approximately 3-5 hours. This is a relatively slow charging speed compared to modern smartphones, but it's typical for devices in this price range. The Oukitel C2's superior battery life mitigates the impact of slower charging.
