Oscal Tiger 8 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Rugged Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid charging and a slight performance edge, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T is the better choice. Its 66W charging capability and Helio G99 chipset offer a more responsive experience. However, the Oscal Tiger 8’s impressive 53:38h endurance makes it ideal for extended off-grid use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Tiger 8 | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 171.1 x 77.7 x 8.5 mm (6.74 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210.5 g (7.44 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, DokeOS 4.2 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/5.0" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Glacier Blue | Black |
| Price | - | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 53:38h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (98 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Tiger 8
- Exceptional battery endurance (53:38h)
- Potentially lower cost due to older chipset
- 800 charge cycles suggest long-term battery health
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Potentially less powerful processor
- Lacks wireless charging
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Helio G99 offers a performance boost
- Shorter battery endurance compared to Oscal
- Potentially higher price point
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can expect both to utilize IPS LCD panels. The Ulefone, being a slightly newer model, *may* benefit from improved color calibration or viewing angles. The absence of details like refresh rate or peak brightness makes it difficult to assess display quality beyond speculation.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, the market segment suggests both phones will prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. We can assume both will include a standard wide-angle lens and potentially a macro lens, but image quality will likely be heavily reliant on software processing. The Ulefone may have a slight edge due to potentially newer image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 19T leverages the MediaTek Helio G99, featuring a CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Oscal Tiger 8’s Unisoc T8100, which has 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both chipsets are built on a 6nm process, the G99’s additional Cortex-A55 cores suggest a potential advantage in multi-tasking and sustained performance. The Unisoc T8100, however, may offer competitive performance in single-core tasks. The G99’s Mali-G57 MC2 GPU is likely to provide a smoother gaming experience than the T8100’s GPU, though specific frame rates will depend on the game and settings.
Battery Life
The Oscal Tiger 8 boasts an impressive 53:38h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. This is a significant advantage for users who prioritize longevity. The Ulefone Power Armor 19T, while likely having a respectable battery capacity, focuses on charging speed. Its 66W wired charging can deliver 52% charge in just 30 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Oscal’s 18W charging. The inclusion of 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging on the Ulefone adds further convenience, features absent on the Oscal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Tiger 8 if you need a phone that can truly last for days on a single charge, and aren't overly concerned with the absolute fastest processing speeds. This is the phone for campers, hikers, and anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prefer quicker charging, a more responsive user interface, and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance.