Oscal Tiger 13 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Rugged Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more refined chipset, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T is the better choice. However, the Oscal Tiger 13’s impressive 49-hour endurance and 800-cycle battery longevity make it ideal for extended off-grid use where power outlets are scarce.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Tiger 13 | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 21 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 21 | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.6 x 8.7 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 700 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke OS 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hurricane Black, Violet Blue | Black |
| Price | - | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 49:06h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (138 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Tiger 13
- Exceptional battery endurance (49:06h)
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles)
- Potentially strong burst performance with multiple A76 cores
- Slow 18W charging
- Unisoc chipset may have limited software support
- Lack of wireless charging
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Fast 66W wired charging (52% in 30 min)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Mediatek Helio G99 offers better sustained performance and gaming
- Battery endurance not specified
- Potentially lower battery longevity compared to Oscal
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given the price points, we can expect both to utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here will be on the internal hardware. The lack of information on refresh rates or resolution makes a direct comparison impossible, but the rugged nature of both devices suggests durability over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t detail camera specifications. Given the market segment, we anticipate both phones will feature multi-camera setups, but image quality will likely be determined by software processing rather than cutting-edge sensors. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess which phone will deliver superior photos. We can assume both will include standard features like HDR and night mode.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 19T leverages the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) with a CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Oscal Tiger 13’s Unisoc T760 (6nm) featuring 1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x Cortex-A76, and 4x Cortex-A55 cores. While both chips are built on a 6nm process for efficiency, the G99’s architecture, with more A55 cores, suggests potentially better sustained performance in multi-threaded tasks. The Tiger 13’s inclusion of three additional Cortex-A76 cores *could* offer a burst of speed in specific applications, but the G99’s optimized design likely provides a more consistent experience. The G99 is known for its gaming capabilities, making the 19T the better option for mobile gamers.
Battery Life
The Oscal Tiger 13 boasts an impressive 49:06h endurance rating and a battery capable of 800 charge cycles, indicating a focus on longevity. The Ulefone Power Armor 19T, while lacking an endurance figure, compensates with significantly faster charging: 66W wired (52% in 30 minutes), 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless. This charging speed is a major advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery. The 18W charging on the Tiger 13 will take considerably longer to reach a full charge. The 800 cycle rating on the Tiger 13 suggests the battery will retain capacity for a longer period, even with frequent use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Tiger 13 if you need maximum battery life and are willing to trade off some charging speed and peak performance. This phone is perfect for multi-day camping trips, construction work, or any scenario where consistent power is critical. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prefer faster charging, a more modern chipset with potentially better gaming performance, and the convenience of wireless charging options. This is the better choice for users who need a quick power boost and appreciate a more versatile charging ecosystem.