Oscal Tiger 13 vs Cubot KingKong 7: A Deep Dive into Budget Rugged Performance

The rugged smartphone market is booming, offering durable devices at increasingly affordable prices. The Oscal Tiger 13 and Cubot KingKong 7 represent compelling options in this space, but they take distinctly different approaches to performance and longevity. This comparison dissects their core specifications to determine which device delivers the best value for users prioritizing battery life and modern processing power.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a durable phone with exceptional battery life, the Oscal Tiger 13 is the clear winner. Its Unisoc T760 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a significant performance advantage and improved efficiency over the Cubot KingKong 7’s older 12nm Helio P60, while also boasting impressive 49:06h endurance.

PHONES
Phone Names Oscal Tiger 13 Cubot KingKong 7
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA-
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2024, October 212022
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, October 21Available. Released 2022
Body
Dimensions164.8 x 75.6 x 8.7 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 in)166.8 x 83.5 x 14 mm (6.57 x 3.29 x 0.55 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight200 g (7.05 oz)267 g (9.42 oz)
Display
ProtectionMohs level 7-
Resolution720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density)1080 x 2300 pixels (~400 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.36 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90Hz, 700 nitsIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetUnisoc T760 (6 nm)Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57Mali-G72 MP3
OSAndroid 14, Doke OS 4.0Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal256GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Triple50 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens64 MP, (wide), AF 16 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsYes
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, (wide)32 MP
Video1080p@30fpsYes
Sound
35mm jackYesUnspecified
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioFM radioUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired-
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsHurricane Black, Violet BlueBlack
EU LABEL
Battery49:06h endurance, 800 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass C (138 falls)-
RepairabilityClass B-

Oscal Tiger 13

  • Superior processing power with the Unisoc T760
  • Exceptional battery life (49:06h endurance)
  • More efficient 6nm chipset reduces heat and throttling

  • Charging speed is standard (18W)
  • Camera specifications are unknown, potentially average

Cubot KingKong 7

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Rugged design for durability
  • Acceptable for basic smartphone tasks

  • Older and less efficient Helio P60 chipset
  • Significantly shorter battery life
  • Likely limited performance for demanding apps

Display Comparison

Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. The KingKong 7’s older chipset suggests it may have a lower refresh rate. The Tiger 13’s newer processor could potentially support a higher refresh rate, leading to smoother scrolling and animations, though this is speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on durability rather than minimizing size.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is impossible. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature basic camera setups. The focus is likely on functionality rather than high-end image quality. We can assume both will include a primary sensor, and potentially a depth or macro lens. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The 2MP macro lens commonly found in this price range is unlikely to provide significant value.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oscal Tiger 13’s Unisoc T760 (6nm) is a modern processor featuring a Cortex-A76-based CPU configuration (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55). This architecture provides a substantial performance uplift compared to the Cubot KingKong 7’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm) with its Cortex-A73/A53 configuration (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53). The 6nm fabrication process of the T760 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. Users who engage in moderate gaming or multitasking will experience a noticeably smoother experience on the Tiger 13.

Battery Life

The Oscal Tiger 13 truly shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 49:06h of usage. While the KingKong 7’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the older, less efficient Helio P60 chipset will inevitably result in shorter runtimes. The Tiger 13’s 18W charging is standard for this price point, and while not exceptionally fast, it’s adequate for topping up the battery overnight. The combination of a modern, efficient chipset and likely a large battery capacity makes the Tiger 13 the clear winner for users prioritizing longevity.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oscal Tiger 13 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge and handle everyday tasks with ease. It’s ideal for travelers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Cubot KingKong 7 if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are willing to compromise on processing power and battery endurance, primarily using the phone for basic communication and light tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Unisoc T760 in the Oscal Tiger 13 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc T760 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The 6nm process and Cortex-A76 cores provide a performance boost over the Helio P60, but it’s not a flagship-level chipset. Expect playable performance, but don’t anticipate ultra settings or consistently high frame rates.
❓ How does the 6nm process of the Unisoc T760 impact the Oscal Tiger 13’s battery life compared to the 12nm Helio P60?
The 6nm fabrication process is significantly more power-efficient than the 12nm process used in the Helio P60. This means the Unisoc T760 consumes less power for the same level of performance, directly translating to longer battery life. The Oscal Tiger 13’s 49:06h endurance is a direct result of this improved efficiency.
❓ Is the Cubot KingKong 7 a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls, texts, and basic social media?
Yes, the Cubot KingKong 7 is a suitable option for basic usage. The Helio P60 is capable of handling calls, texts, and social media apps without issue. However, users should be aware that the battery life will be shorter, and performance may feel sluggish when multitasking or using more demanding apps.