Oscal Tiger 12 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Rugged Phone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T is the clear winner with its 66W charging and wireless charging options. However, the Oscal Tiger 12 offers impressive 48h 18m endurance and a proven 800-cycle battery lifespan, making it ideal for extended off-grid use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Tiger 12 | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 14 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 168.5 x 76.6 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, Doke OS 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cerulean Blue, Flowing Purple, Cloudwing Grey | Black |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:18h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (114 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Tiger 12
- Exceptional battery endurance (48h 18m)
- High battery cycle lifespan (800 cycles)
- Competitive price point (likely)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- No wireless charging support
- Limited camera details available
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Ultra-fast 66W wired charging (52% in 30min)
- Wireless charging (15W) and reverse wireless charging (5W)
- Convenience of quick top-ups
- Potentially shorter overall battery lifespan
- Slightly lower endurance compared to Oscal
- May run warmer under sustained load due to faster charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share the same Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, meaning display differences won't dramatically impact performance. However, details like panel type and refresh rate (not provided) would be crucial. The focus here is on ruggedness, so screen protection is paramount. While neither spec sheet details screen brightness, a higher nit rating on one device would be beneficial for outdoor visibility. Bezels are likely similar given the price point, and color accuracy is a secondary concern for this market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipset, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely employ similar image signal processors (ISPs) within the Helio G99. The quality of the main sensor (not specified) and lens aperture will be the primary determinants of image quality. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant advantage for low-light photography. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on many budget phones, the main sensor's megapixel count and sensor size are the key factors to consider.
Performance
Both the Oscal Tiger 12 and Ulefone Power Armor 19T are powered by the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The 6nm process node offers a good balance of power and efficiency. The real-world performance difference will likely hinge on thermal management – how effectively each device dissipates heat under sustained load. RAM configuration (not specified) will also play a role, with LPDDR5 or LPDDR5x being preferable for smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Power Armor 19T boasts a significant charging advantage with 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 52% charge in just 30 minutes. It also includes 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging – features absent on the Oscal Tiger 12. The Oscal Tiger 12 compensates with impressive endurance, rated at 48h 18m, and a claimed 800 charge cycles, suggesting a longer overall battery lifespan. While the Ulefone offers speed, the Oscal prioritizes longevity and sustained use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Tiger 12 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and you frequently find yourself away from power outlets. This is the phone for campers, hikers, and those who value longevity. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prefer the convenience of incredibly fast charging, and appreciate the flexibility of wireless charging, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance. This is the phone for users who need to quickly top up their device throughout the day.