Oscal Tiger 12 vs Doogee S98 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery life and efficient performance, the Oscal Tiger 12 emerges as the winner. Its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in power efficiency over the Doogee S98 Pro’s 12nm Helio G96, translating to significantly longer endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Tiger 12 | Doogee S98 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 14 | 2022, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November | Available. Released 2022, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 168.5 x 76.6 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 320 g (11.29 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, Doke OS 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal imaging camera |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cerulean Blue, Flowing Purple, Cloudwing Grey | Black |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:18h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (114 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Tiger 12
- Superior battery endurance (48:18h)
- More efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Longer battery lifespan (800 charge cycles)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Display specifications unknown
Doogee S98 Pro
- Convenience of 15W wireless charging
- Potentially more refined software experience (Doogee's brand reputation)
- 33W wired charging
- Less efficient Mediatek Helio G96 chipset
- Shorter battery life compared to Oscal Tiger 12
- Larger process node (12nm) leads to more heat
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of LTPO or AMOLED technology suggests neither will offer variable refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on durability rather than minimizing size. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, prioritizing visibility in direct sunlight over color fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature multi-camera setups with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially macro/depth sensors. The absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it impossible to determine a clear winner. We can assume image processing will be geared towards enhancing colors and contrast for social media sharing, rather than prioritizing natural accuracy. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lens is questionable, offering limited detail and often serving as a marketing feature rather than a practical tool.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oscal Tiger 12’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Doogee S98 Pro’s Helio G96 (12nm). The smaller 6nm node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency. While both CPUs feature the same core configuration – Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – the G99’s architecture benefits from optimizations resulting in better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. This means the Tiger 12 will likely handle demanding tasks and gaming for longer periods without significant performance drops. The G96’s larger process node will generate more heat, potentially impacting sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Oscal Tiger 12 boasts a remarkable 48:18h endurance rating, a significant advantage over what we’d expect from the Doogee S98 Pro. This is directly attributable to the more efficient Helio G99 chipset. While both phones offer 33W wired charging, the Doogee S98 Pro adds 15W wireless charging. This convenience comes at a cost, as wireless charging is inherently less efficient than wired charging, and the S98 Pro’s less efficient chipset will require more frequent charging overall. The Tiger 12’s 800 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Tiger 12 if you need exceptional battery life for extended outdoor use, frequent travel, or simply dislike frequent charging. Its focus is on maximizing uptime. Buy the Doogee S98 Pro if you prioritize the convenience of wireless charging and are willing to trade some battery endurance for that feature. It’s a good choice for users already invested in wireless charging ecosystems.