Oscal Tank 1 vs. Doogee S98 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a robust, long-lasting phone, the Oscal Tank 1 emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly superior battery endurance (154:08h) and more modern, efficient Dimensity 7050 chipset provide a noticeable advantage in both daily use and sustained performance, justifying its position as the winner.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Tank 1 | Doogee S98 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 10 | 2022, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2022, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 184 x 83 x 29.5 mm (7.24 x 3.27 x 1.16 in) | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 640 g (1.41 lb) | 320 g (11.29 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 700 nits | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, DokeOS 4.2 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.2", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal imaging camera |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1440p, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (100 dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 20000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | € 399.99 / $ 267.07 / £ 499.99 | About 470 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 154:08h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Tank 1
- Exceptional battery endurance (154:08h)
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Faster 55W wired charging
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Display specifications unknown
- Camera details limited
Doogee S98 Pro
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Potentially more feature-rich display (speculative)
- Adequate performance for casual use
- Rugged design
- Less powerful and efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Likely shorter battery life
- 12nm process is less efficient
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged focus, both likely utilize durable, scratch-resistant glass. The Doogee S98 Pro's inclusion of wireless charging suggests a potential for a more feature-rich display, perhaps with higher refresh rates, but this is speculative. The Oscal Tank 1's focus on endurance may prioritize power efficiency over display extravagance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, the market positioning of these devices suggests a focus on practicality over photographic excellence. Both likely feature multiple lenses, but image quality will heavily depend on sensor size and image processing algorithms, which are unknown. The absence of high-resolution sensor details suggests neither phone will compete with flagship camera phones.
Performance
The Oscal Tank 1’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) represents a significant leap in processing power and efficiency over the Doogee S98 Pro’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, outperform the G96’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. The 6nm fabrication process further enhances efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance during intensive tasks like gaming or video editing. This benefits users who frequently multitask or engage in resource-intensive applications. The G96 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will likely exhibit more throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Oscal Tank 1’s battery endurance of 154:08h is a standout feature, dwarfing what is typically expected from a rugged smartphone. This is likely due to a combination of a large battery capacity (unspecified) and the power efficiency of the Dimensity 7050 chipset. The 55W wired charging is significantly faster than the Doogee S98 Pro’s 33W wired charging, reducing downtime. While the Doogee S98 Pro offers 15W wireless charging, this convenience is offset by the slower overall charging speed and likely lower battery endurance. The Oscal Tank 1 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Tank 1 if you prioritize exceptional battery life, need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks without throttling, and value a more modern chipset architecture. Buy the Doogee S98 Pro if you prefer the convenience of wireless charging and are primarily focused on casual use, where the Helio G96’s performance is sufficient, and battery life is less critical.