Oscal Tank 1 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oscal Tank 1 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset offers significantly improved processing power and efficiency compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660. While both are rugged, the Tank 1’s superior battery endurance and faster charging further solidify its position.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Tank 1 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 10 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 184 x 83 x 29.5 mm (7.24 x 3.27 x 1.16 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 640 g (1.41 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 700 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, DokeOS 4.2 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.2", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76" | 8 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (100 dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 20000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | € 399.99 / $ 267.07 / £ 499.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 154:08h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Tank 1
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 7050
- Much faster 55W wired charging
- Longer battery endurance (154:08h)
- Potential for less established software support compared to Cat
- Rugged design may add bulk
Cat S62 Pro
- Proven Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 platform
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Lower overall performance
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the market segment, both devices likely feature LCD panels optimized for outdoor visibility. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, may have lower peak brightness and color accuracy. The Oscal Tank 1, benefiting from newer display technology, potentially offers a more vibrant and detailed viewing experience. Bezels are likely substantial on both to contribute to structural integrity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, given the rugged nature of both phones, image processing likely prioritizes practicality over artistic flair. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison difficult. The Cat S62 Pro’s camera system is likely optimized for quick, reliable image capture in challenging conditions. The Oscal Tank 1, with its newer chipset, may benefit from more advanced image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. We can assume both will have a focus on durability rather than cutting-edge camera features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oscal Tank 1’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 7050’s octa-core configuration (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides significantly more processing power than the Snapdragon 660’s (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7050 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Tank 1 will handle demanding applications and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Oscal Tank 1 boasts an impressive 154:08h endurance, suggesting a large battery capacity and efficient power management. Its 55W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Cat S62 Pro, which lacks detailed charging specifications but is likely considerably slower. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Tank 1 adds a convenient feature for topping up accessories. While the Cat S62 Pro may offer respectable battery life, the Tank 1’s combination of endurance and rapid charging provides a superior user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Tank 1 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value long battery life with fast charging. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a proven, albeit older, platform with established software support and are less concerned with peak performance or the latest features. The Cat S62 Pro is a solid choice for basic communication and field work where extreme processing power isn't essential.