Oscal Tank 1 vs Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and performance, the Oscal Tank 1 emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer 154:08h battery endurance and the more efficient Dimensity 7050 chipset outweigh the Blackview BV8800’s brighter screen. However, the BV8800 remains a viable option for those who heavily rely on display visibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Tank 1 | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 10 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 184 x 83 x 29.5 mm (7.24 x 3.27 x 1.16 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 640 g (1.41 lb) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 700 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, DokeOS 4.2 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.2", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (100 dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 20000 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | € 399.99 / $ 267.07 / £ 499.99 | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 154:08h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Tank 1
- Exceptional battery life (154:08h endurance)
- Powerful and efficient Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Faster 55W wired charging
- Longer battery lifespan (800 cycles)
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Blackview BV8800
- Brighter display (501 nits)
- Established rugged phone brand
- Reverse wired charging
- Good contrast ratio (1348:1)
- Older and less efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Shorter battery endurance (199h)
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits and a 1348:1 contrast ratio, making it more visible in direct sunlight. However, the Oscal Tank 1’s display specifications are not provided, leaving its outdoor visibility unknown. The identical contrast ratio suggests similar image quality in controlled environments. The BV8800’s brightness advantage is crucial for users working outdoors or in brightly lit conditions, while the Tank 1’s display performance remains a question mark without further data.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. Without this information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the BV8800 is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility. The focus should be on the main sensor’s quality, which remains undisclosed for both phones. Therefore, camera performance is a tie based on the available data.
Performance
The Oscal Tank 1’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) represents a significant leap in performance and efficiency over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 7050 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the BV8800’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz – resulting in faster processing speeds and improved multitasking. The 6nm fabrication process also translates to lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling, benefiting sustained performance during gaming or demanding applications. The BV8800’s G96 is a capable chip, but it’s demonstrably outmatched by the Tank 1’s Dimensity 7050.
Battery Life
The Oscal Tank 1 dominates in battery endurance with a staggering 154:08h rating, compared to the Blackview BV8800’s 199h. While the BV8800's initial endurance rating appears higher, it's important to note the Tank 1 also boasts 800 battery cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan. The Tank 1 also supports 55W wired charging, significantly faster than the BV8800’s 33W (which takes 90 minutes for a full charge, with 31% achieved in 30 minutes). The Tank 1’s faster charging and potentially longer lifespan, combined with its superior endurance, make it the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Tank 1 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you require a modern processor for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing. It’s ideal for outdoor professionals, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prioritize a brighter display for outdoor use, and if you prefer a more established brand in the rugged phone space, accepting a trade-off in battery life and processing power.