Oscal Spider 8 vs Cubot KingKong 7: A Deep Dive into Affordable Ruggedness
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing modern CPU architecture and faster charging, the Oscal Spider 8 emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset, while not a performance leader, offers a more efficient and future-proof design compared to the aging Helio P60 in the Cubot KingKong 7.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Spider 8 | Cubot KingKong 7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 251.3 x 170.1 x 14.9 mm (9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 in) | 166.8 x 83.5 x 14 mm (6.57 x 3.29 x 0.55 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 854 g (1.88 lb) | 267 g (9.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.36 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 13, Doke OS_P 3.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP secondary unspecified camera | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, (wide), AF 16 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM Radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 13000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | About 220 EUR | - |
Oscal Spider 8
- More modern Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging
- 5W reverse wired charging capability
- Detailed camera specs are unknown
- Battery capacity not specified
Cubot KingKong 7
- Potentially lower price point
- Ruggedized design for durability
- Established brand in the rugged phone market
- Older MediaTek Helio P60 chipset
- Slower charging speeds (likely)
- May struggle with demanding applications
Display Comparison
Neither Oscal nor Cubot provide display specifications beyond the basic ruggedized construction. Assuming both utilize IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket, the user experience will likely be similar in terms of color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is expected. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, prioritizing durability over a modern, edge-to-edge aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the price point, both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility (often 2MP macro or depth sensors). The image processing capabilities will be crucial, and without detailed information, it’s difficult to predict which phone will produce better photos. The aperture of the main sensor will be a key factor; a wider aperture (lower f-number) will allow more light in, resulting in better low-light performance. Without this data, we can only assume both phones will deliver acceptable, but not exceptional, image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oscal Spider 8’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm) utilizes Cortex-A75 cores for its performance cluster, offering a noticeable architectural advantage over the Cubot KingKong 7’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm) which relies on older Cortex-A73 cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the A75 cores in the T616 provide better single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The T616’s Cortex-A55 efficiency cores also contribute to improved power efficiency. The Helio P60, while capable, is showing its age and may struggle with newer, more demanding applications. Neither device is a gaming powerhouse, but the T616 will likely offer a more playable experience in moderately demanding titles.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Oscal Spider 8’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Cubot KingKong 7, which lacks detailed charging information. 33W charging will drastically reduce charging times, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day. Even with a slightly smaller battery, the faster charging speed could result in a more convenient user experience. The Spider 8 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Spider 8 if you need a phone for everyday tasks, light gaming, and appreciate faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups. It’s ideal for users who want a more modern chipset for better long-term software support. Buy the Cubot KingKong 7 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with an older chipset that may show its age in demanding applications. It’s a reasonable option for basic communication and limited app usage.