Oscal Pilot 3 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and longevity, the Oscal Pilot 3 emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 118:45h endurance and 800 charge cycles outweigh the Ulefone’s faster charging and slightly more powerful chipset for the average user seeking a reliable, long-lasting rugged device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Pilot 3 | Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June | 2023, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 16 | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.2 x 86 x 14.5 mm (7.17 x 3.39 x 0.57 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 357 g (12.59 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 750 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, DokeOS 4.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) 5 MP, f/2.2, (FLIR thermal camera, Lepton module) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 6W reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Ion 7500 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | $ 198.16 / £ 219.99 / € 269.99 | About 700 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 118:45h endurance, 800 cycles | 88:30h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Oscal Pilot 3
- Exceptional battery life (118:45h endurance)
- Superior long-term battery health (800 cycles)
- Efficient Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Slower charging speeds (33W wired)
- Potentially less responsive in demanding tasks
Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra
- Faster charging (66W wired, 52% in 30min)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 7050)
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Significantly shorter battery life (88:30h endurance)
- Potentially reduced long-term battery health (1000 cycles)
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both devices utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here shifts to the internal hardware impacting performance. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, so analysis relies on typical configurations for this market segment. We can expect both phones to feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to declare a winner. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device would be a significant advantage, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 7050, featuring 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This represents a step up in CPU performance compared to the Oscal Pilot 3’s Dimensity 6300, which uses 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The A78 cores in the 7050 offer improved single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and a more responsive user experience. However, both chipsets are fabricated on a 6nm process, suggesting similar power efficiency characteristics. The real-world impact will be noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing or graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pilot 3’s 118:45h endurance is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra’s 88:30h. This difference is substantial, indicating the Pilot 3 can last nearly 30 hours longer on a single charge under similar usage conditions. Furthermore, the Pilot 3’s 800 battery cycles suggest superior long-term battery health compared to the Ulefone’s 1000 cycles. While the Ulefone compensates with 66W wired charging (52% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless charging, the Oscal’s 33W wired and 6W reverse wired charging are slower. The Ulefone’s faster charging is convenient, but the Pilot 3’s extended endurance minimizes the need for frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pilot 3 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and you value long-term battery health. This is ideal for outdoor professionals, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra if you prioritize quicker app loading times, smoother multitasking, and faster charging, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance. This phone is better suited for users who frequently game or use demanding applications.