Oscal Pilot 3 vs Doogee S98 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term battery health and sustained performance, the Oscal Pilot 3 emerges as the winner. Its newer Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a more efficient architecture than the Doogee S98 Pro’s 12nm Helio G96, translating to better thermal management and a claimed 800 charge cycles.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Pilot 3 | Doogee S98 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June | 2022, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 16 | Available. Released 2022, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 182.2 x 86 x 14.5 mm (7.17 x 3.39 x 0.57 in) | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 357 g (12.59 oz) | 320 g (11.29 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 750 nits | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, DokeOS 4.1 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal imaging camera |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 6W reverse wired | 33W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 7500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | $ 198.16 / £ 219.99 / € 269.99 | About 470 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 118:45h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oscal Pilot 3
- Superior chipset efficiency (Dimensity 6300)
- Exceptional battery endurance (118:45h)
- Long-term battery health (800 charge cycles)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Display specifications unknown
Doogee S98 Pro
- Convenient wireless charging (15W)
- 33W wired charging
- Potentially higher refresh rate display (speculative)
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G96)
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The Doogee S98 Pro's market positioning suggests a potentially higher refresh rate, though this is speculative. Users should prioritize checking independent reviews for color accuracy and peak brightness when making a decision.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature multi-camera setups. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it difficult to assess image quality. Users should focus on independent camera tests to evaluate real-world performance, as megapixel count alone is not indicative of quality. We can assume both will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oscal Pilot 3’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) boasts a more advanced fabrication process compared to the Doogee S98 Pro’s Helio G96 (12nm). This 6nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency. While both CPUs feature a similar core configuration (2x Cortex-A76 & 6x Cortex-A55), the Dimensity 6300’s architecture delivers a performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads. The Helio G96, while capable, is known to throttle under prolonged stress, impacting gaming and demanding applications. The Pilot 3 will likely offer a smoother, more consistent experience.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pilot 3’s endurance is rated at 118:45h, a significant figure indicating exceptional battery life. While the capacity isn't specified, the Dimensity 6300’s efficiency plays a crucial role. The Doogee S98 Pro offers 33W wired charging and adds 15W wireless charging, a convenience the Pilot 3 lacks. However, the Pilot 3’s 800 charge cycle rating suggests superior long-term battery health, meaning it will retain capacity for a longer period. The Pilot 3’s 33W wired charging is adequate, but the S98 Pro’s wireless charging provides an alternative for users who prefer cable-free power-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pilot 3 if you need exceptional battery life, prioritize long-term device health with its 800 charge cycle rating, and value a more modern, efficient processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Doogee S98 Pro if you prefer the convenience of wireless charging and are willing to trade some battery efficiency for that feature, and your usage primarily involves less demanding applications.