Oscal Pilot 3 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and future-proofing, the Oscal Pilot 3 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers superior efficiency and performance potential compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s aging Snapdragon 660. However, the Cat S62 Pro may appeal to those heavily invested in Qualcomm’s ecosystem or prioritizing established software support.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Pilot 3 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 16 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 182.2 x 86 x 14.5 mm (7.17 x 3.39 x 0.57 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 357 g (12.59 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 750 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15, DokeOS 4.1 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 6W reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 7500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | $ 198.16 / £ 219.99 / € 269.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 118:45h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oscal Pilot 3
- Significantly longer battery life (118:45h endurance)
- More efficient and powerful Dimensity 6300 chipset (6nm)
- Faster 33W wired charging with 6W reverse charging
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Software support longevity is uncertain
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation for ruggedness
- Qualcomm’s proven ISP for consistent image quality
- Potentially better software support and updates
- Older and less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset (14nm)
- Shorter battery life compared to Oscal Pilot 3
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's release date, it likely utilizes an older LCD panel. The Oscal Pilot 3, being a newer device, *may* incorporate a more advanced panel technology, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality, so expect both to feature reinforced glass and potentially lower peak brightness compared to mainstream smartphones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660 is known for its competent image signal processor (ISP), offering reliable image processing and color reproduction. The Oscal Pilot 3’s camera performance is less predictable, relying heavily on Mediatek’s ISP capabilities and software optimization. Given the market segment, both phones likely prioritize practicality over cutting-edge camera features. Expect decent performance in good lighting conditions, but potentially struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oscal Pilot 3’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process inherently provides better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and improved sustained performance. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.4 GHz) are demonstrably faster than the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores (4x2.2 GHz). This means the Pilot 3 will handle demanding tasks and multitasking with greater ease. The Snapdragon 660, while still capable, will likely exhibit more throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pilot 3 dominates in battery endurance with a reported 118:45h runtime. This is a substantial advantage over what is typically achievable with the Snapdragon 660’s power consumption. The 33W wired charging on the Pilot 3 is also faster than the charging speeds commonly found on the Cat S62 Pro. Furthermore, the Pilot 3 offers 6W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The 800 charge cycles rating for the Pilot 3 suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself, a crucial factor for rugged phone users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pilot 3 if you need exceptional battery life for extended fieldwork, value a more modern and efficient processor for smoother multitasking and future app compatibility, and are comfortable with a potentially less-established brand. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a proven track record of software updates and support, prefer Qualcomm’s image signal processing for consistent photo quality, and require compatibility with specific enterprise applications optimized for the Snapdragon platform.