Oscal Pilot 2 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing modern efficiency and gaming capability, the Oscal Pilot 2 is the clear winner. Its Helio G99 chipset, coupled with 45W charging, provides a noticeable performance and usability advantage over the aging Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, despite the Cat phone's established brand reputation.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Pilot 2 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.67 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 368 g (12.98 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14, DokeOS 4.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Orange | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
Oscal Pilot 2
- More efficient Helio G99 chipset
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Likely better camera performance due to newer ISP
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Ruggedness certification details are unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in rugged phones
- Potentially more robust build quality (depending on certifications)
- Wide availability of accessories
- Older, less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely inferior camera performance
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's age, it likely utilizes an older LCD panel. The Oscal Pilot 2, being a newer device, may benefit from a more modern IPS LCD or even AMOLED panel, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of refresh rate data suggests neither phone targets high-motion content consumers.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the age of the Cat S62 Pro suggests its camera system is likely less advanced than what's achievable with a modern mid-range chipset like the Helio G99. The G99’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) likely offers improved noise reduction and dynamic range. It's reasonable to assume the Oscal Pilot 2 will deliver better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oscal Pilot 2’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a significant leap in efficiency over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process allows the G99 to deliver comparable performance with lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations with similar peak clock speeds (2.2 GHz), the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores are architecturally superior to the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores, resulting in better single-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking for the Oscal Pilot 2. The older Snapdragon 660 will struggle with demanding tasks and newer games.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the Oscal Pilot 2’s 45W wired charging is a substantial advantage over the Cat S62 Pro’s likely slower charging speeds. This means the Pilot 2 can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. The Helio G99’s superior power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life, even with a similar capacity battery, as it consumes less power during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pilot 2 if you need a rugged phone that can handle modern mobile games and benefits from faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who want a balance of durability and performance without breaking the bank. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-established brand with a proven track record in the rugged phone space and are less concerned with demanding applications or the latest chipset technology. It’s a solid choice for basic communication and work tasks in harsh environments.