Oscal Pilot 1 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and value, the Oscal Pilot 1 emerges as the winner. Its remarkable 166:39h endurance rating significantly outpaces the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h active use score and 80h endurance, making it ideal for heavy users. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging and more powerful processor appeal to those who value speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Pilot 1 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 185.5 x 85 x 22 mm (7.30 x 3.35 x 0.87 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 540 g (1.19 lb) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~68.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 700 nits | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 (12 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, DokeOS 4.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (138dB, 5W) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 20% in 27 min 10W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 15000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 249.99 / $ 168.88 / £ 159.99 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oscal Pilot 1
- Unmatched battery life (166:39h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles)
- Excellent value for money
- Older chipset (Helio G81)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Display brightness likely lower
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster and more efficient chipset (Dimensity 7030)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Faster charging (68W)
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Higher price point
- Less impressive battery cycle count (unspecified)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Oscal Pilot 1, which lacks published brightness data. While the Pilot 1’s display resolution isn’t specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely offers superior clarity and color accuracy. The Edge 40 Neo’s display technology is also likely to be more advanced, potentially including features like higher refresh rates not found on the Pilot 1.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, given Motorola’s history, the Edge 40 Neo likely features a more sophisticated camera system with improved image processing. While the Oscal Pilot 1 may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting, the Edge 40 Neo is expected to excel in low-light conditions and offer more versatile shooting modes. The absence of details on the Pilot 1’s sensor size and aperture suggests it may not compete with the Edge 40 Neo’s capabilities. We can assume the Edge 40 Neo will have better video recording capabilities as well.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, fabricated on a 6nm process, represents a clear performance advantage over the Oscal Pilot 1’s MediaTek Helio G81 (12nm). The Dimensity 7030’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, outperform the Pilot 1’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Pilot 1 will handle everyday tasks, but the Edge 40 Neo is the better choice for demanding users.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pilot 1’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 166:39h. This dwarfs the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h active use score and 80h endurance rating. While the Edge 40 Neo compensates with significantly faster charging – 68W wired (50% in 15 minutes) versus the Pilot 1’s 33W (20% in 27 minutes) – the sheer longevity of the Pilot 1 is a major draw. The Pilot 1 also boasts an impressive 800 charge cycles, suggesting long-term battery health. The Edge 40 Neo prioritizes quick top-ups, while the Pilot 1 focuses on minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pilot 1 if you need a phone that can reliably last through multiple days of moderate use, and if maximizing battery life is your primary concern. It’s the perfect companion for travelers or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more responsive user experience, faster charging speeds, and a brighter display, and are willing to compromise on ultimate battery endurance.