Infinix Note 30 Pro vs Oscal Pilot 1: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Infinix Note 30 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, delivers noticeably better performance than the Oscal Pilot 1’s Helio G81. The significantly faster 68W charging, including wireless charging, and reverse wireless capabilities, outweigh the Pilot 1’s longer battery endurance for the average user.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Pilot 1 | Infinix Note 30 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2023, May 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2023, May 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 185.5 x 85 x 22 mm (7.30 x 3.35 x 0.87 in) | 162.7 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 540 g (1.19 lb) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| - | IP53 | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~68.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 700 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 900 nits (peak) |
| - | * the display diagonal size and resolution is unconfirmed | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, DokeOS 4.0 | Android 13, XOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (138dB, 5W) | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | Sound by JBL 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 20% in 27 min 10W reverse wired | 68W wired, PD3.0, 80% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 15000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Magic Black, Variable Gold |
| Models | - | X678B |
| Price | € 249.99 / $ 168.88 / £ 159.99 | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oscal Pilot 1
- Exceptional battery endurance (166:39h)
- 800 charge cycles promise longevity
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Older Helio G81 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Lacks wireless charging
Infinix Note 30 Pro
- Faster and more efficient Helio G99 chipset
- 68W fast charging with PD3.0
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slightly lower battery endurance
- Potentially higher price
- May throttle under sustained heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. The Note 30 Pro’s more modern chipset suggests a higher probability of a higher refresh rate display, potentially 90Hz or 120Hz, contributing to a smoother visual experience. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Note 30 Pro’s design language generally leans towards a more premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of the Infinix Note 30 Pro suggests a more sophisticated camera system. While both likely feature a multi-camera setup, the Note 30 Pro is more likely to include features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and larger sensor sizes, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Oscal Pilot 1 likely relies on software processing to compensate for hardware limitations.
Performance
The Infinix Note 30 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a significant architectural upgrade over the Oscal Pilot 1’s Helio G81 (12nm). The G99 utilizes Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the Pilot 1’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to a roughly 15-20% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks. The 6nm process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained gaming. While both phones feature octa-core CPUs, the G99’s architecture and fabrication process give it a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pilot 1 boasts an impressive 166:39h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. However, the Infinix Note 30 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging. The Note 30 Pro’s 68W wired charging, supporting PD3.0, can reach 80% charge in 30 minutes, while the Pilot 1’s 33W charging takes 27 minutes to reach 20%. Furthermore, the Note 30 Pro adds 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. The Pilot 1’s 10W reverse wired charging is slower and less convenient. While the Pilot 1 wins on raw endurance, the Note 30 Pro’s charging speed and wireless capabilities are a major advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pilot 1 if you absolutely prioritize maximum battery life and are willing to compromise on processing power and charging speed. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets for extended periods. Buy the Infinix Note 30 Pro if you value a smoother user experience, faster charging, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance. This is the better choice for gamers and multimedia consumers.