Oscal has positioned both the Pad 90 and Pad 15 as affordable Android tablets powered by the Unisoc T606 chipset. While sharing a core processor, the two diverge significantly in battery endurance and charging capabilities, making the choice less about raw power and more about how you intend to use the device. This comparison will dissect these differences to help you determine which tablet offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and sustained use, the Oscal Pad 90 is the clear winner. Its exceptional 124:54h endurance, coupled with 800 battery cycles, significantly outweighs the Pad 15’s lack of detailed battery specifications and limited 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2023, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2023, September |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 258.1 x 169.6 x 8 mm (10.16 x 6.68 x 0.31 in) | 246.5 x 156.3 x 7.6 mm (9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 534 g (1.18 lb) | 449 g (15.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~138 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.92 inches, 345.8 cm2 (~79.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.36 inches, 305.5 cm2 (~79.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 350 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 14, DokeOS_P 4.0 | Android 13, DokeOS_P 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | No | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 7700 mAh | 8280 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Sky Blue | Green, Gray |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 124:54h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class C (135 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Pad 90
- Exceptional 124:54h battery endurance
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles)
- Identical performance to Pad 15 for everyday tasks
- Detailed display specs are unknown
- Camera specifications are not available
Oscal Pad 15
- Potentially lower initial cost
- Identical performance to Pad 90 for everyday tasks
- Standard 10W wired charging
- Significantly lower battery endurance (implied)
- Slower charging speed
- Lack of battery cycle count information
Display Comparison
Both tablets are presumed to utilize LCD panels, typical for this price segment. However, detailed display specifications like resolution, brightness, and color gamut are absent. Without this data, a direct comparison is impossible. The absence of features like LTPO or high refresh rates is expected, focusing the value proposition on core functionality rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided for either device. Given the target market, it’s reasonable to expect basic camera capabilities suitable for casual snapshots and video calls. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. Focusing on camera performance would be misleading without concrete data.
Performance
Both the Oscal Pad 90 and Pad 15 are equipped with the Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means performance will be virtually identical for everyday tasks like web browsing, video playback, and light multitasking. The 12nm process node suggests moderate thermal efficiency; however, without knowing the tablet’s cooling solution, sustained performance under heavy load remains uncertain. The shared CPU and chipset mean the user experience will be largely the same across both devices.
Battery Life
This is where the Oscal Pad 90 truly shines. Its advertised 124:54h endurance is a significant advantage, indicating substantially longer usage between charges. Furthermore, the 800 battery cycle rating suggests the battery will retain a higher percentage of its original capacity over its lifespan compared to a tablet without this specification. The Oscal Pad 15, while powered by the same chipset, only lists 10W wired charging. This slower charging speed will necessitate longer periods connected to a power source, diminishing its usability for users on the go. The lack of detailed battery capacity information for the Pad 15 makes a direct mAh comparison impossible, but the endurance difference strongly favors the Pad 90.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 90 if you need a tablet for extended travel, long reading sessions, or frequent use away from a power outlet. Its superior battery life and cycle count provide peace of mind. Buy the Oscal Pad 15 if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are consistently near a power source, as the 10W charging will require more frequent top-ups.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How will the Unisoc T606 chipset handle demanding games on the Oscal Pad 90 or Pad 15?
The Unisoc T606 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it's not designed for graphically intensive titles at maximum settings. Expect playable frame rates in less demanding games, but you may need to lower graphics settings for smoother performance in more demanding games. Both tablets will offer a similar gaming experience due to the identical chipset.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Oscal Pad 15 sufficient for daily use?
While 10W charging is functional, it's relatively slow compared to modern fast-charging standards. This means you'll need to dedicate a significant amount of time to fully recharge the Pad 15, especially if you're a heavy user. The Oscal Pad 90’s longer battery life mitigates the need for frequent charging, making it a more convenient option for users on the go.
❓ What does the 800 battery cycle rating on the Oscal Pad 90 mean for long-term use?
A battery cycle is completed when you've used 100% of the battery capacity. The Oscal Pad 90’s 800 cycle rating indicates that the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its original capacity after being fully charged and discharged 800 times. This translates to a longer lifespan and reduced battery degradation over time compared to tablets with lower cycle ratings.
