The sub-$200 Android tablet market is fiercely competitive. Both the Oscal Pad 70 and Nokia T10 aim to deliver a functional tablet experience without breaking the bank. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Nokia T10 leveraging a more modern chipset while the Oscal Pad 70 focuses on simplicity. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which tablet offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia T10 emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc T606 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU, provides a significantly smoother and more responsive experience than the Oscal Pad 70’s quad-core processor. While both charge at the same 10W rate, the Nokia T10’s superior processing power justifies the slight price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Available. Released 2022, August 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 246.5 x 163 x 9.9 mm (9.70 x 6.42 x 0.39 in) | 208 x 123.2 x 9 mm (8.19 x 4.85 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 520.5 g (1.15 lb) | 375 g (13.23 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 360 nits (typ), 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12, DokeOS_P 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.65µm |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 5250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey | Ocean Blue |
| Models | - | TA-1503, TA-1472, TA-1462, TA-1457 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
Oscal Pad 70
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Suitable for very basic tasks
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Likely limited multitasking capabilities
- Potentially lower quality display
Nokia T10
- Superior processor performance with Unisoc T606
- More responsive user experience
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Potentially better display quality
- Slightly higher price
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- Still a budget device with inherent limitations
Display Comparison
Neither Oscal nor Nokia provide detailed display specifications. Given the price point, both tablets likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding resolution, peak brightness, or color gamut makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Nokia T10’s slightly higher price suggests a potentially better-quality panel, though this remains speculative. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, typical of this market segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are positioned as budget devices, and detailed camera specifications are unavailable. It’s safe to assume both feature basic rear and front-facing cameras suitable for video calls and casual snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s impossible to assess image quality, but expectations should be tempered. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device would be largely inconsequential given the limitations of such a small sensor.
Performance
The Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm) chipset is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration – comprised of 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – offers a substantial advantage over the Oscal Pad 70’s unspecified quad-core processor. The Cortex-A75 cores in the T10 provide a noticeable boost in single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness, while the six A55 cores handle background tasks efficiently. The 12nm process node of the T606 also contributes to better power efficiency compared to potentially older, larger-node quad-core designs in the Oscal Pad 70. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more enjoyable user experience on the Nokia T10.
Battery Life
Both the Oscal Pad 70 and Nokia T10 support 10W wired charging. While the charging speed is identical, the Nokia T10’s more efficient Unisoc T606 chipset may result in slightly better real-world battery life. The actual battery capacity of both devices is unknown, but the T10’s processor efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size, leading to comparable or even longer usage times between charges. Expect a full charge to take approximately 3-4 hours with the included 10W charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 70 if you need a basic tablet for extremely light tasks like reading ebooks or simple web browsing, and prioritize the absolute lowest price point. Buy the Nokia T10 if you prefer a more fluid user experience for everyday tasks like streaming video, social media, and light multitasking, and are willing to spend a little more for improved performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia T10 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T606 is a capable processor, it's not designed for high-end gaming. PUBG Mobile will likely be playable at lower graphics settings and frame rates. Expect some stuttering and frame drops during intense action sequences. The Oscal Pad 70 would struggle even more with such titles.
❓ Is the 10W charging speed on both tablets acceptable for daily use?
10W charging is relatively slow by modern standards. Expect a full charge to take around 3-4 hours. This is acceptable for overnight charging, but topping up quickly during the day will be time-consuming. Neither tablet offers fast charging capabilities.
❓ Can the Nokia T10 handle video streaming services like Netflix and YouTube smoothly?
Yes, the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606 chipset is well-suited for streaming video content from services like Netflix and YouTube. The octa-core processor and adequate RAM should provide a smooth and buffer-free viewing experience, even at 1080p resolution.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on these tablets?
Specific storage configurations are not provided in the context data. However, given the price point, both tablets likely offer 32GB or 64GB of internal storage, with microSD card support for expansion. Checking retailer listings is crucial to confirm the exact storage capacity.
