The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, with options like the Oscal Pad 70 and Doogee T10W vying for attention. Both aim to deliver a functional tablet experience at an accessible price point, but they differ significantly in their internal hardware. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which tablet offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Doogee T10W emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset, built on a 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oscal Pad 70’s unspecified quad-core processor, translating to smoother multitasking and app responsiveness. While both share the same 10W charging, the T10W’s more modern architecture offers a superior user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2024, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Available. Released 2024, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.5 x 163 x 9.9 mm (9.70 x 6.42 x 0.39 in) | 246.1 x 162.8 x 9.7 mm (9.69 x 6.41 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 520.5 g (1.15 lb) | 555 g (1.22 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 12, DokeOS_P 3.0 | Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey | Black, Blue |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 70 EUR |
Oscal Pad 70
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward operation
- Suitable for very basic tasks
- Significantly weaker processor
- Likely slower performance
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Doogee T10W
- More powerful Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset
- Improved performance and responsiveness
- Better power efficiency
- May be slightly more expensive
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- Display specifications are unknown
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like resolution, peak brightness, or color gamut suggests a focus on cost reduction over display quality. Users should expect adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both models.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications beyond the presence of cameras, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s safe to assume both tablets feature basic camera setups intended for casual use, such as video calls and quick snapshots. Expect limited low-light performance and image quality. The absence of details suggests neither device prioritizes photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Doogee T10W features the Unisoc Tiger T310, a 12nm quad-core processor with a heterogeneous architecture – 1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration provides a significant performance boost over a generic 'quad-core' processor like the one in the Oscal Pad 70. The Cortex-A75 core in the T10W offers substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The 12nm fabrication process also contributes to better power efficiency compared to older, larger node processes likely used in the Oscal Pad 70. This translates to potentially longer battery life under load. The lack of RAM specifications for both devices makes a complete performance assessment difficult, but the chipset advantage clearly favors the Doogee T10W.
Battery Life
Both the Oscal Pad 70 and Doogee T10W support 10W wired charging. This is a relatively slow charging speed, meaning a full charge will likely take several hours. Without knowing the battery capacity of either device, it’s difficult to determine which offers better battery life. However, the more efficient Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Doogee T10W may allow it to achieve comparable or even longer runtimes despite potentially having a similar battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 70 if you need a basic tablet for extremely light tasks like reading ebooks or simple web browsing and prioritize the absolute lowest possible price. Buy the Doogee T10W if you want a tablet capable of handling more demanding applications, multitasking, and occasional gaming, and appreciate the benefits of a more efficient and powerful chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Doogee T10W be able to handle streaming video services like Netflix and YouTube?
The Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset in the Doogee T10W should be capable of handling standard definition and even 720p streaming video without significant issues. However, high-resolution streaming (1080p or higher) may experience occasional buffering or stuttering, depending on internet connection speed and background app activity.
❓ Is the 10W charging speed a major drawback for either tablet?
Yes, 10W charging is relatively slow by modern standards. Expect a full charge to take several hours. This isn't a deal-breaker for tablets typically used indoors and charged overnight, but it's something to be aware of if you need quick top-ups.
❓ Can the Doogee T10W run popular mobile games?
The Doogee T10W can run some less demanding mobile games, but don't expect a high-performance gaming experience. The Unisoc Tiger T310 is not a gaming-focused chipset. More graphically intensive games will likely require reduced settings and may still experience frame rate drops.
