The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, offering options for streaming, reading, and light productivity. We pit the Oscal Pad 70, a newcomer focused on affordability, against the well-established Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021), a device known for its integration with Amazon’s ecosystem. This comparison will dissect their core components to determine which tablet delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and versatility, the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) is the better choice. Its Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T chipset provides a significantly more responsive experience than the Oscal Pad 70’s quad-core processor, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. However, the Oscal Pad 70 may appeal to those seeking the absolute lowest price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | - |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2021, April 27. Released 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.5 x 163 x 9.9 mm (9.70 x 6.42 x 0.39 in) | 247 x 166 x 9.2 mm (9.72 x 6.54 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 520.5 g (1.15 lb) | 468 g (1.03 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1920 x 1200 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 12, DokeOS_P 3.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Fire OS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| | - | Text-to-Speech English-language content reader |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | Wireless |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Ion |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey | Slate |
| Models | - | T76N2P |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Oscal Pad 70
- Potentially lower price point
- Basic functionality for simple tasks
- Lightweight and portable
- Significantly weaker performance
- Limited app compatibility
- Unknown display quality
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021)
- More powerful processor for smoother performance
- Wireless charging convenience
- Access to Amazon ecosystem and sideloading of Google Play Store
- Amazon’s Fire OS can be restrictive
- Camera quality is basic
- May require sideloading for full app access
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. The Oscal Pad 70’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a standard LCD panel. The Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) also utilizes an LCD, but its 10.1-inch size and 1920x1200 resolution offer a sharper image than what is likely found on the Oscal Pad 70. The lack of information regarding PWM dimming on the Oscal Pad 70 raises concerns for users sensitive to flicker, while the Fire HD 10 Plus’s display, while not exceptional, is generally considered adequate for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are positioned as budget devices, and camera performance typically reflects that. Without specific details on the Oscal Pad 70’s camera, it’s safe to assume it’s a basic sensor. The Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) features a 5MP front and rear camera, which are adequate for video calls but produce images with limited detail and dynamic range. Neither tablet is intended for serious photography.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Oscal Pad 70’s quad-core CPU is a basic configuration, suitable only for the lightest workloads. In contrast, the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) features the Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T, an octa-core processor built on a 12nm process. This chipset combines four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz for performance and four Cortex-A53 cores at the same speed for efficiency. This architecture allows for smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface compared to the Oscal Pad 70. The Fire HD 10 Plus’s superior processing power benefits users who engage in more than just basic tasks.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pad 70 supports 10W wired charging, a relatively slow charging speed. The Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) offers the convenience of wireless charging, a feature absent on the Oscal Pad 70. While the Fire HD 10 Plus’s battery capacity isn’t specified in the context data, its more efficient chipset and wireless charging capability provide a more flexible and user-friendly charging experience. The slower charging speed of the Oscal Pad 70 means longer downtime between uses.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 70 if you need a bare-bones tablet for extremely basic tasks like reading ebooks or simple web browsing, and your budget is severely constrained. Buy the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) if you prefer a smoother, more capable experience for streaming video, light gaming, and accessing a wider range of apps through the Google Play Store (via sideloading), and value the convenience of Amazon’s ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio P60T in the Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) struggle with demanding games?
While the Helio P60T isn't a high-end gaming chip, it's capable of running many popular mobile games at medium settings. Expect some frame drops in graphically intensive titles, but it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Oscal Pad 70’s quad-core processor.
❓ Can I easily install the Google Play Store on the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021)?
Yes, sideloading the Google Play Store onto the Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) is a common practice. While it requires a few extra steps, numerous online guides detail the process, unlocking access to a much wider range of apps than the Amazon Appstore offers.
❓ What type of storage does the Oscal Pad 70 use, and is it expandable?
The context data does not specify the storage type or expandability of the Oscal Pad 70. Given its budget positioning, it likely uses eMMC storage, which is slower than UFS. Expandability via microSD card is also uncertain and would be a key consideration for users needing more than the base storage.
