The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, and the Oscal Pad 70 and Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) represent compelling options for users seeking affordable Android experiences. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, focusing on performance differences stemming from their respective chipsets and the implications for everyday use.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) offers a more refined experience thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 680 (or Helio G80) chipset and faster 20W charging. While the Oscal Pad 70 is cheaper, the performance gap is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/75 Mbps - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2022, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2022, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.5 x 163 x 9.9 mm (9.70 x 6.42 x 0.39 in) | 251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 520.5 g (1.15 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi glass | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) - LTE model Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi only model |
| Chipset | Rockchip RK3562 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) - LTE model Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) - Wi-Fi only model |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Adreno 610 - LTE model Mali-G52 MC2 - Wi-Fi only model |
| OS | Android 14, Doke OS_P 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMCP/uMCP |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 480p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey, Blue | Storm Grey, Frost Blue |
| Price | - | About 260 EUR |
Oscal Pad 70 WiFi
- Lower price point makes it highly accessible.
- Sufficient for basic tasks like web browsing and reading.
- Potentially longer battery life due to the less powerful chipset (depending on battery capacity).
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Lenovo.
- Slower charging speed (10W).
- Limited multitasking capabilities.
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
- Much faster performance thanks to the Snapdragon 680 or Helio G80.
- Faster 20W charging.
- Option for 4G LTE connectivity (on select models).
- Higher price compared to the Oscal Pad 70.
- Battery life may be slightly shorter under heavy load.
- Display specifications are not detailed.
Display Comparison
Neither Oscal nor Lenovo provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, the tablet segment generally prioritizes viewing angles and color reproduction over peak brightness. The lack of information necessitates assuming both utilize IPS LCD panels. The Lenovo’s slightly larger screen size (10.61” vs. Oscal’s 10.4”) may offer a more immersive viewing experience. Without knowing PWM frequencies, it’s impossible to assess potential eye strain, but budget tablets often employ lower frequencies.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are likely equipped with basic sensors suitable for casual snapshots and video calls. Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but focusing on megapixel counts alone is misleading. Image processing algorithms play a crucial role, and both tablets likely employ software optimizations to enhance image quality. Given the price point, expecting flagship-level camera performance is unrealistic.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) boasts either the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) or the MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm), both significantly more powerful than the Oscal Pad 70’s Rockchip RK3562. The Snapdragon 680’s octa-core configuration (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) and 6nm process provide a substantial performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The RK3562’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 is geared towards efficiency, making it suitable for basic tasks but struggling with demanding applications. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use. The Wi-Fi only version of the Lenovo uses the Helio G80, which is still a step up from the RK3562, but not as significant as the Snapdragon.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While the Oscal Pad 70’s battery capacity is unknown, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) offers a reasonable capacity. However, the Lenovo’s 20W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Oscal’s 10W charging. This translates to considerably faster charging times, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability. The more efficient Snapdragon 680 will also contribute to longer battery life during typical use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 70 WiFi if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a tablet for very basic tasks like web browsing, light reading, and occasional video playback. Buy the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) if you value smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience, even if it means spending a bit more. The Lenovo is also the better choice for users who want the option of 4G connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oscal Pad 70 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Rockchip RK3562 chipset in the Oscal Pad 70 is not powerful enough to run graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact smoothly. You'll likely experience significant frame rate drops and lag, even on the lowest settings. It's better suited for casual games and less demanding titles.
❓ Does the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) support split-screen multitasking effectively?
The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen), particularly the Snapdragon 680 variant, handles split-screen multitasking much more effectively than the Oscal Pad 70. The more powerful processor and ample RAM allow you to run multiple apps simultaneously without significant performance slowdowns.
❓ Is the 4G LTE connectivity on the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus worth the extra cost?
If you frequently travel or need internet access in areas without Wi-Fi, the 4G LTE connectivity is a valuable addition. It allows you to stay connected on the go without relying on public hotspots. However, if you primarily use your tablet at home or in Wi-Fi-enabled locations, the Wi-Fi-only model may suffice.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge each tablet?
With its 20W charging, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) will likely charge from 0% to 100% in around 2.5 to 3 hours. The Oscal Pad 70, with its 10W charging, will take considerably longer, potentially 4-5 hours or more.
