The sub-$200 tablet market is fiercely competitive, offering a surprising amount of functionality for the price. We pit the Oscal Pad 70 WiFi, powered by Rockchip’s RK3562, against the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) with its MediaTek Helio P60T to determine which device provides the best balance of performance, features, and value for everyday users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) is the better choice. While the Oscal Pad 70 offers a more modern CPU architecture, the Helio P60T’s octa-core configuration and optimized software integration provide a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for media consumption and light gaming. The addition of wireless charging is a significant convenience factor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | - |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Technology | GSM | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2021, April 27. Released 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.5 x 163 x 9.9 mm (9.70 x 6.42 x 0.39 in) | 247 x 166 x 9.2 mm (9.72 x 6.54 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 520.5 g (1.15 lb) | 468 g (1.03 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi glass | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1920 x 1200 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Rockchip RK3562 | Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke OS_P 4.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Fire OS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | 480p@30fps | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| | - | Text-to-Speech English-language content reader |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | Wireless |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Ion |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey, Blue | Slate |
| Models | - | T76N2P |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
Oscal Pad 70 WiFi
- Clean Android Experience
- Potential for Future Software Updates
- Modern CPU Architecture (RK3562)
- Quad-Core CPU May Limit Performance
- Slower 10W Wired Charging Only
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021)
- Octa-Core CPU (Helio P60T) for Better Performance
- Wireless Charging Convenience
- Optimized Amazon Software Experience
- Amazon’s Fire OS (Limited App Access)
- Potential for Bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, but specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable. The Fire HD 10 Plus benefits from Amazon’s software optimizations for content viewing. Bezels are expected to be similar on both, typical for this price point. The lack of high refresh rate or LTPO technology on either tablet means smooth scrolling isn’t a key feature.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are expected to feature basic camera setups suitable for video calls and occasional snapshots. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. Focusing on the primary sensor resolution is misleading; image quality depends heavily on sensor size, lens quality, and image processing. We anticipate similar, unremarkable results from both devices.
Performance
This is where the core difference lies. The Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus’s MediaTek Helio P60T, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core CPU (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53). This contrasts with the Oscal Pad 70’s Rockchip RK3562, a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53. While the RK3562 utilizes a newer architecture, the Helio P60T’s higher core count provides a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks and overall responsiveness. The Helio P60T’s Mali-G72 MP3 GPU also likely outperforms the RK3562’s integrated GPU, offering a better gaming experience. RAM configurations are unknown, but the software optimization on the Fire HD 10 Plus will likely mitigate any RAM differences.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is unknown for both devices. However, the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus gains a significant advantage with its support for wireless charging. The Oscal Pad 70 is limited to 10W wired charging. While a larger battery capacity on the Oscal Pad 70 could offset the slower charging, the convenience of wireless charging on the Fire HD 10 Plus is a compelling feature. Expect both tablets to offer around 8-10 hours of typical usage (web browsing, video streaming).
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 70 WiFi if you prioritize a clean Android experience and potential future software updates, and are comfortable with slightly less polished performance. It’s a good option for users who prefer tinkering and customization. Buy the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) if you value a seamless, content-focused experience, benefit from Amazon’s ecosystem, and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging. It’s ideal for streaming, reading, and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio P60T in the Fire HD 10 Plus experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Helio P60T isn't a high-end gaming chip, its thermal performance is generally adequate for casual gaming. The Fire HD 10 Plus’s larger chassis likely provides sufficient heat dissipation to prevent severe throttling during moderate gaming sessions. However, demanding titles at maximum settings may still result in some performance reduction over time.
❓ Is the Amazon Fire OS on the HD 10 Plus a significant limitation compared to standard Android?
Fire OS is a heavily customized version of Android. It prioritizes Amazon’s content ecosystem and lacks full access to the Google Play Store. While you can sideload apps, it’s not a seamless process. This is a major consideration for users heavily invested in the Google ecosystem or requiring specific apps not available through the Amazon Appstore.
❓ Can I expect regular software updates on the Oscal Pad 70 WiFi?
Oscal is a relatively new brand, and their track record for long-term software support is uncertain. While the RK3562 chipset is modern, the availability of future Android updates will depend on Oscal’s commitment to maintaining the device. This is a risk to consider when choosing the Oscal Pad 70.
