The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, and the Oscal Pad 60 and Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) represent compelling options for users seeking affordable entertainment and productivity. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, focusing on the core differences in processing power, charging capabilities, and overall value to determine which tablet emerges as the better choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and faster charging, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 680 or Helio G80 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Oscal Pad 60’s quad-core processor, and the 20W charging is twice as fast, making it ideal for on-the-go users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/75 Mbps - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2022, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Available. Released 2022, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.5 x 163 x 9.9 mm (9.70 x 6.42 x 0.39 in) | 251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 537 g (1.18 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) - LTE model Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi only model |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) - LTE model Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) - Wi-Fi only model |
| GPU | - | Adreno 610 - LTE model Mali-G52 MC2 - Wi-Fi only model |
| OS | Android 12, DokeOS_P 3.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMCP/uMCP |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey | Storm Grey, Frost Blue |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Oscal Pad 60
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Suitable for basic tasks
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
- Faster Snapdragon 680 or Helio G80 processor
- 20W fast charging
- Option for 4G LTE connectivity
- Potentially higher price
- May experience some throttling under heavy load
- Software updates may be less frequent than premium brands
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) benefits from Lenovo’s established display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate colors. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of tablets in this segment. Without specific data on resolution or brightness, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Lenovo’s brand reputation suggests a slightly more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a key differentiator in this price range. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both tablets feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots and video calls. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization suggests neither device will excel in low-light conditions. Focusing on the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities, the Snapdragon 680 in the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus likely offers superior image processing, resulting in slightly better image quality.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Oscal Pad 60’s quad-core CPU is significantly outmatched by the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)’s chipset options. The Snapdragon 680 (6nm) variant boasts an octa-core configuration with Kryo 265 Gold and Silver cores clocked up to 2.4 GHz, offering a considerable boost in multi-core performance and efficiency. Even the Wi-Fi only model with the Helio G80 (12nm) provides an octa-core setup, exceeding the Oscal’s capabilities. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 680 further enhances efficiency, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app launches, and a more responsive user experience on the Lenovo.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the charging speed is a clear advantage for the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) with its 20W wired charging. The Oscal Pad 60 is limited to 10W charging, meaning significantly longer charging times. This difference is crucial for users who rely on their tablets throughout the day and need to quickly top up the battery. Even if the Oscal Pad 60 has a slightly larger battery capacity, the Lenovo’s faster charging will likely result in less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 60 if you need a basic tablet for light tasks like reading ebooks, browsing the web, and occasional video playback, and are on a very tight budget. Buy the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and quicker charging, especially if you plan to use the tablet for streaming, gaming, or more demanding applications. The Lenovo also offers the option of 4G connectivity, a feature absent in the Oscal.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) support expandable storage via microSD card?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specifications, Lenovo tablets in this series typically include a microSD card slot for expandable storage, allowing users to increase the available storage capacity beyond the internal options. This is a valuable feature for storing large media files or apps.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) capable of handling mobile gaming?
The Snapdragon 680 is a capable chipset for casual mobile gaming. It can handle most popular titles at medium settings, but demanding games may require lower graphics settings to maintain a smooth frame rate. The 6nm process node also helps to mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ What type of USB port does the Oscal Pad 60 use?
Given the 10W wired charging specification, the Oscal Pad 60 likely utilizes a Micro-USB port. This is a common port for budget tablets, but it's slower and less convenient than the USB-C port found on the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen).
❓ Does the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) support video playback in HD and Full HD resolutions?
Yes, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) is fully capable of playing HD and Full HD videos. The Snapdragon 680 chipset includes hardware decoding support for common video codecs, ensuring smooth playback of popular streaming services and downloaded content.
