The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, with options like the Oscal Pad 60 and Doogee T10W vying for attention. Both aim to deliver a functional tablet experience at an accessible price point, but they differ significantly in their internal hardware. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which tablet offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing basic tablet functionality like media consumption and light tasks, the Oscal Pad 60 offers a functional experience. However, the Doogee T10W, powered by the Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset, emerges as the stronger performer, offering a noticeable boost in responsiveness and overall usability, making it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2024, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Available. Released 2024, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.5 x 163 x 9.9 mm (9.70 x 6.42 x 0.39 in) | 246.1 x 162.8 x 9.7 mm (9.69 x 6.41 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 537 g (1.18 lb) | 555 g (1.22 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 12, DokeOS_P 3.0 | Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey | Black, Blue |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 70 EUR |
Oscal Pad 60
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Simple user experience
- Less powerful processor
- Slower performance
- Likely limited multitasking capabilities
Doogee T10W
- More powerful Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset
- Improved responsiveness and multitasking
- More efficient CPU architecture
- Potentially higher price
- 10W charging is slow
- Camera quality likely basic
Display Comparison
Both tablets lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. Assuming both utilize standard IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket, the user experience will likely be similar in terms of color accuracy and viewing angles. Without knowing resolution or brightness, it's difficult to differentiate. However, the Doogee T10W's slightly higher price point *may* indicate a marginally better panel quality, but this is speculative.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and the provided data doesn't offer details beyond the presence of cameras. It's safe to assume both feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. Users should not expect high-quality images from either tablet.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Oscal Pad 60 relies on a generic quad-core CPU, while the Doogee T10W features the Unisoc Tiger T310. This 12nm chipset boasts a more sophisticated CPU configuration – a single 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 core for performance tasks and three 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. The Cortex-A75 architecture represents a significant leap over older Cortex-A53 designs typically found in similarly priced tablets, translating to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both are quad-core, the architectural advantage of the T310 is substantial.
Battery Life
Both the Oscal Pad 60 and Doogee T10W utilize 10W wired charging. This slow charging speed suggests similar battery capacities, likely in the 5000-6000 mAh range, common for budget tablets. The 10W charging will result in lengthy charge times – expect several hours to reach a full charge from empty. The efficiency of the Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Doogee T10W *could* translate to slightly better battery life during typical usage, but this is dependent on software optimization.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 60 if you need a very basic tablet for static tasks like reading ebooks or displaying information, and are extremely price-sensitive. Buy the Doogee T10W if you prefer a more responsive experience for web browsing, video streaming, and light multitasking, and appreciate the benefits of a more modern chipset architecture.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Doogee T10W handle multiple apps running simultaneously?
The Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset in the Doogee T10W is better equipped for multitasking than the generic quad-core processor in the Oscal Pad 60. While it won't rival flagship tablet performance, it should handle two or three apps running concurrently without significant slowdown.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either tablet?
With both tablets utilizing 10W charging, expect a full charge from 0% to take approximately 3-5 hours. This is a relatively slow charging speed, so overnight charging is recommended.
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset a reliable choice for a budget tablet?
The Unisoc Tiger T310 is a solid choice for a budget tablet chipset. It offers a noticeable performance improvement over older, less efficient processors commonly found in this price range, providing a smoother and more responsive user experience.
