The tablet market is heating up with affordable options, and the Oscal Pad 13 and Realme Pad X represent compelling choices for users seeking a larger screen experience without breaking the bank. While both aim for the budget segment, they take different approaches to performance and features. The Oscal Pad 13 focuses on providing a functional experience with a Unisoc chipset, while the Realme Pad X leverages a more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G and faster charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Realme Pad X is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 5G offers a significant performance uplift over the Oscal Pad 13’s Unisoc T606, and the 33W charging is a substantial convenience. However, the Oscal Pad 13 remains a viable option for basic tasks and media consumption if budget is the absolute primary concern.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2022, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 17 | Available. Released 2022, June 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 158 x 7.6 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 in) | 256.5 x 161.1 x 7.1 mm (10.10 x 6.34 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 435 g (15.34 oz) | 499 g / 506 g (1.10 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic charging) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~213 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.95 inches, 341.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, PD
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 7680 mAh | 8340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Space Grey | Glowing Gray, Glacier Blue, Green |
| Models | - | RMP2107, RMP2108 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1664:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.5 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 395824 (v9)
GeekBench: 2026 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oscal Pad 13
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable for light media consumption
- Significantly weaker performance
- Less efficient chipset
- Limited charging information
Realme Pad X
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- 33W fast charging with PD
- Brighter display for better visibility
- Higher price compared to Oscal Pad 13
- Camera performance likely basic
- 5G functionality may not be utilized by all users
Display Comparison
The Realme Pad X boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 496 nits, compared to the Oscal Pad 13’s unspecified brightness. While both displays share a similar contrast ratio around 1655:1-1664:1, the higher brightness of the Realme Pad X translates to better visibility in outdoor conditions. The lack of detailed display specifications for the Oscal Pad 13, such as panel type (IPS, TFT) and color gamut coverage, suggests a more basic visual experience. The Realme Pad X’s superior brightness is a significant advantage for media consumption and general usability.
Camera Comparison
Given the budget nature of both devices, camera performance isn't a primary focus. Neither device’s camera specifications are provided beyond the chipsets. It’s safe to assume both will feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a meaningful comparison. Users shouldn’t expect flagship-level image quality from either tablet.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Pad X’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oscal Pad 13’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 offers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 695’s CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores, outperforms the Oscal Pad 13’s 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Realme Pad X. The 5G capability of the Snapdragon 695 is also a future-proofing benefit, though its utility depends on regional 5G availability.
Battery Life
The Realme Pad X’s 33W wired charging with PD support is a major advantage. This allows for significantly faster charging times compared to the Oscal Pad 13, which lacks detailed charging specifications. The Realme Pad X also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the more efficient Snapdragon 695 in the Realme Pad X will likely result in comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Oscal Pad 13.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 13 if you need a basic tablet for light tasks like reading, web browsing, and occasional video streaming, and your budget is extremely limited. It’s a good choice for users who prioritize affordability over raw performance. Buy the Realme Pad X if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for multitasking, gaming, and content creation, and you value faster charging and potential 5G connectivity. It’s ideal for users who want a tablet that can keep up with their digital lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Oscal Pad 13 struggle with demanding apps like video editors or graphically intensive games?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 is a budget-oriented chipset. While it can handle basic tasks, it will likely exhibit noticeable lag and slowdowns when running demanding applications. The Realme Pad X’s Snapdragon 695 is far better equipped for these workloads.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Realme Pad X from 0% to 100% using the 33W charger?
Based on similar devices with 33W charging, the Realme Pad X should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is a significant improvement over the likely slower charging time of the Oscal Pad 13.
❓ Does the Realme Pad X support external storage via microSD card?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specifications, Realme tablets often include microSD card support. Checking the official product page or user reviews is recommended to confirm this feature for the Pad X.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Realme Pad X useful if I don't have 5G coverage in my area?
No, the 5G modem will fall back to 4G LTE if 5G is unavailable. The 5G capability primarily offers future-proofing and potentially faster speeds in areas with 5G coverage. It doesn't negatively impact performance on 4G networks.
