The sub-$200 Android tablet market is fiercely competitive. Both the Oscal Pad 13 and Doogee T10W aim to deliver a functional tablet experience without breaking the bank. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dives deep into the implications of the Unisoc T606 in the Oscal Pad 13 versus the Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Doogee T10W, helping you determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oscal Pad 13 emerges as the better choice. Its octa-core CPU, built on the same 12nm process as the T10W’s chip, provides a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks and overall responsiveness. While the Doogee T10W offers a slightly newer chipset, the core count difference outweighs this advantage, making the Oscal Pad 13 the more capable all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2024, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 17 | Available. Released 2024, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 158 x 7.6 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 in) | 246.1 x 162.8 x 9.7 mm (9.69 x 6.41 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 435 g (15.34 oz) | 555 g (1.22 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 7680 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Space Grey | Black, Blue |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 70 EUR |
Oscal Pad 13
- Octa-core CPU offers superior multitasking performance.
- Likely better responsiveness in demanding applications.
- Potentially faster charging (spec not confirmed, but likely).
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially limiting viewing experience.
- Camera performance likely average for the price range.
Doogee T10W
- Simpler processor may lead to slightly longer battery life.
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer).
- Newer chipset architecture (though core count is lower).
- Quad-core CPU will struggle with multitasking and demanding apps.
- Slow 10W charging is a significant drawback.
- Overall performance likely to be noticeably slower than the Oscal Pad 13.
Display Comparison
Neither Oscal nor Doogee provide detailed display specifications. Assuming both utilize IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket, the display experience will likely be similar in terms of color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of information regarding peak brightness or refresh rates suggests neither tablet will excel in outdoor visibility or fluid motion. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Given the price point, camera performance is unlikely to be a key differentiator. Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but it’s safe to assume both tablets feature basic camera setups geared towards casual snapshots. Focusing on megapixel counts would be misleading; image quality will be more heavily influenced by sensor size, lens quality, and software processing – areas where information is lacking. Expect adequate performance in well-lit conditions, but struggles in low light.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPU configuration. The Oscal Pad 13’s Unisoc T606 features an octa-core setup with 2x Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6x Cortex-A55 cores also at 1.6 GHz. This contrasts with the Doogee T10W’s Unisoc Tiger T310, which has a quad-core configuration: 1x Cortex-A75 at 2.0 GHz and 3x Cortex-A55 at 1.8 GHz. While the T310’s A75 core has a slightly higher clock speed, the T606’s additional cores will significantly benefit multi-threaded applications and background task management. The T606 will likely exhibit superior performance in scenarios like video editing, running multiple apps, and even more demanding games. Both chips are built on a 12nm process, suggesting similar thermal characteristics.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Doogee T10W’s 10W wired charging is a notable limitation. This slower charging speed will result in significantly longer charge times compared to tablets with faster charging capabilities. While a less powerful processor *could* translate to slightly better battery life, the convenience of quicker charging is often a more significant factor for users. The Oscal Pad 13’s charging speed is not specified, but it’s reasonable to expect it to be at least comparable to, if not faster than, the T10W’s 10W charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 13 if you prioritize multitasking, smoother app switching, and a more responsive user experience. It’s ideal for users who plan to run multiple apps simultaneously, engage in light gaming, or frequently browse the web with numerous tabs open. Buy the Doogee T10W if your primary use case is very basic – primarily media consumption and light web browsing – and you value simplicity and potentially longer battery life due to the less demanding processor, despite its slower 10W charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Doogee T10W be able to handle streaming video services like Netflix and YouTube smoothly?
The Doogee T10W should be capable of handling standard definition and potentially 720p streaming content without significant issues. However, the quad-core processor may struggle with higher resolutions (1080p or above) or demanding streaming apps, leading to occasional buffering or lag. The Oscal Pad 13, with its octa-core processor, is more likely to provide a smoother streaming experience at higher resolutions.
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T310 a significant upgrade over previous Unisoc chips found in budget tablets?
The Unisoc Tiger T310 represents a modest architectural improvement over older Unisoc chips, primarily through its use of newer Cortex-A75 cores. However, the quad-core configuration limits its overall performance potential. The Oscal Pad 13’s Unisoc T606, despite being an older chip, compensates with a higher core count, resulting in superior performance in most real-world scenarios.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Doogee T10W with its 10W charging?
Given the likely battery capacity (estimated around 6000-7000mAh, based on similar tablets), a full charge from 0% to 100% on the Doogee T10W with its 10W charger will likely take between 4 to 6 hours. This is considerably slower than tablets with 18W or higher charging capabilities.
