The Android tablet market offers a wide spectrum of choices, from ultra-budget options to premium contenders. We're pitting the Oscal Pad 100, a device focused on longevity and affordability, against the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4, a performance-oriented tablet aiming for a more demanding user. This comparison will dissect their core components to reveal which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a premium experience, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power compared to the Oscal Pad 100’s Unisoc T615. However, the Oscal Pad 100 excels in battery endurance, making it a viable option for users prioritizing long-lasting power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2022, August 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 281.7 x 177.2 x 8 mm (11.09 x 6.98 x 0.31 in) | 285 x 185.2 x 6.7 mm (11.22 x 7.29 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 610 g (1.34 lb) | 620 g (1.37 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~243 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 445.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 360 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MIUI Pad 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 60% in 36 min, 100% in 68 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 9000 mAh | Li-Po 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Black, Silver, Green |
| Price | - | About 400 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 108:47h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class B (156 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Pad 100
- Exceptional battery endurance (108:47h)
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles)
- Affordable price point (implied)
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4
- Limited chipset details hinder a full assessment
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 5G chipset
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Likely superior display quality
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Oscal Pad 100
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the Oscal Pad 100, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 boasts a large 12.4-inch display. The Snapdragon 870’s image signal processor (ISP) likely supports a higher quality display panel. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s larger screen size and more powerful chipset suggest a superior visual experience, particularly for content creation and gaming. The absence of detailed display specs for the Oscal Pad 100 makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s likely to be a lower-resolution panel.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Oscal Pad 100 are unavailable. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s camera system, while not the primary focus of a tablet, benefits from the Snapdragon 870’s ISP. Without specific sensor information for the Oscal Pad 100, it’s safe to assume the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 offers superior image quality and processing capabilities. The Xiaomi’s ISP will likely provide better noise reduction and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oscal Pad 100’s Unisoc T615 (12nm). The Snapdragon 870 features a Kryo 585 CPU with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the Unisoc T615’s 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to substantially faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far more capable gaming experience on the Xiaomi Pad. The 7nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 870 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pad 100 claims an impressive 108:47h endurance and 800 battery cycles, suggesting a focus on longevity. However, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 compensates for potentially lower endurance with its 67W wired charging, achieving 60% charge in 36 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes. This rapid charging capability minimizes downtime. While the Oscal Pad 100 may last longer on a single charge, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s quick charging offers convenience and reduces the impact of battery drain.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 100 if you need a tablet primarily for basic tasks like media consumption, reading, and light web browsing, and value exceptional battery life above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 if you demand smooth multitasking, gaming, and a more responsive user experience, and are willing to trade some battery endurance for significantly increased performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 in real-world use compared to the Oscal Pad 100?
The Snapdragon 870 in the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 is significantly faster – expect app launch times to be nearly halved, smoother multitasking with more apps open simultaneously, and a much more enjoyable gaming experience. The Unisoc T615 in the Oscal Pad 100 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
❓ Does the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 make a significant difference in daily use?
Yes, the 67W charging is a game-changer. Being able to reach 100% charge in under 70 minutes minimizes downtime, especially important for a tablet used on the go. The Oscal Pad 100, while offering longer endurance, will take considerably longer to fully recharge.
❓ Is the Oscal Pad 100 suitable for playing demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
While technically possible, the Unisoc T615 chipset in the Oscal Pad 100 will likely struggle to deliver a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience in demanding titles. Expect low frame rates and potential stuttering. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 is far better suited for gaming.
