The tablet market offers a compelling middle ground between smartphones and laptops, and the Oscal Pad 100 and Realme Pad X represent two distinct approaches to this space. The Oscal Pad 100 prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Realme Pad X focuses on a more efficient chipset and a brighter display. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which tablet delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day battery life and long-term reliability, the Oscal Pad 100 is the clear winner. Its impressive 108:47h endurance significantly outpaces the Realme Pad X. However, the Realme Pad X offers a superior viewing experience with its brighter display and more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset, making it ideal for media consumption and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February | 2022, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2022, June 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 281.7 x 177.2 x 8 mm (11.09 x 6.98 x 0.31 in) | 256.5 x 161.1 x 7.1 mm (10.10 x 6.34 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 610 g (1.34 lb) | 499 g / 506 g (1.10 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic charging) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~213 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.95 inches, 341.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 360 nits | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, PD
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 9000 mAh | 8340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Glowing Gray, Glacier Blue, Green |
| Models | - | RMP2107, RMP2108 |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1664:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.5 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 395824 (v9)
GeekBench: 2026 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 108:47h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class B (156 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Pad 100
- Exceptional battery life (108:47h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (800 charge cycles)
- Potentially lower cost due to Unisoc chipset
- Less powerful processor than the Realme Pad X
- Display specifications are limited
- Charging speed is unknown
Realme Pad X
- Brighter and more vibrant display (496 nits)
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Fast 33W charging with PD support
- Shorter battery life compared to Oscal Pad 100
- Potentially higher price
- Battery lifespan not specified
Display Comparison
The Realme Pad X boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 496 nits, compared to the Oscal Pad 100 which lacks published brightness data. This brightness advantage, coupled with a 1664:1 contrast ratio (nearly identical to the Pad X’s 1655:1), makes the Realme Pad X far more usable outdoors or in brightly lit environments. While both displays share a similar contrast ratio, the lack of detailed display specifications for the Oscal Pad 100 – such as panel type or color gamut coverage – puts it at a disadvantage for visually demanding tasks. The Realme Pad X’s display is clearly geared towards media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and detailed camera specs are absent for the Oscal Pad 100. The Realme Pad X’s camera capabilities are likely standard for its price point, focusing on functional image capture rather than exceptional quality. Without specific sensor details for the Oscal Pad 100, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but given its focus on core functionality, it’s reasonable to assume a similar level of performance to the Realme Pad X’s camera system.
Performance
The Realme Pad X’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Oscal Pad 100’s Unisoc T615 (12nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the Unisoc T615’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8 GHz in single-core tasks, while both chips utilize six efficiency cores for background processes. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Realme Pad X. The Unisoc T615 is adequate for basic tasks, but the Snapdragon 695 provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pad 100’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 108:47 hours. This is likely achieved through a combination of a larger battery capacity (unspecified) and the power efficiency of the Unisoc T615 chipset. In contrast, the Realme Pad X lacks this extreme endurance, relying on its 33W wired charging (with PD support) and 5W reverse wired charging to mitigate shorter runtimes. The 33W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups, while the Oscal Pad 100’s charging speed is unknown. Furthermore, the Oscal Pad 100 boasts 800 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan before battery degradation becomes noticeable.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 100 if you need a tablet that can reliably last through multiple days of moderate use, such as reading, note-taking, or occasional video streaming, and value longevity with its 800 charge cycles. Buy the Realme Pad X if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display for enjoying movies and games, and appreciate the faster performance and 33W charging offered by the Snapdragon 695, even if it means more frequent charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Snapdragon 695 in the Realme Pad X compared to the Unisoc T615 in the Oscal Pad 100 for gaming?
The Snapdragon 695’s more modern architecture and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable performance boost in gaming. While neither tablet is designed for demanding AAA titles, the Realme Pad X will deliver smoother frame rates and a more responsive experience in popular mobile games. The Unisoc T615 can handle casual gaming, but may struggle with graphically intensive titles.
❓ Does the Oscal Pad 100’s long battery life come at the cost of usability? Will it feel sluggish compared to the Realme Pad X?
While the Oscal Pad 100 prioritizes battery life, the Unisoc T615 is still a capable processor for everyday tasks like browsing, email, and video streaming. However, the Realme Pad X will feel noticeably snappier in app launches and multitasking due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset. The trade-off is endurance versus responsiveness.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Realme Pad X a significant advantage over the Oscal Pad 100, even with its longer battery life?
Yes, the 33W charging on the Realme Pad X is a valuable feature. While the Oscal Pad 100’s exceptional battery life minimizes the need for frequent charging, the Realme Pad X’s faster charging allows for quick top-ups when needed, providing greater flexibility. This is particularly useful for users who frequently use their tablet throughout the day.
