The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, and the Oscal Pad 100 and Doogee T10W represent compelling options for users seeking affordable Android experiences. While both tablets utilize Unisoc chipsets, significant differences in CPU core configuration and battery endurance create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects these differences to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and longevity, the Oscal Pad 100 emerges as the stronger choice. Its octa-core CPU and impressive 108:47h endurance rating provide a smoother, more reliable experience than the Doogee T10W’s quad-core processor and limited 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February | 2024, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2024, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 281.7 x 177.2 x 8 mm (11.09 x 6.98 x 0.31 in) | 246.1 x 162.8 x 9.7 mm (9.69 x 6.41 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 610 g (1.34 lb) | 555 g (1.22 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 360 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 9000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Black, Blue |
| Price | - | About 70 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 108:47h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class B (156 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Pad 100
- Superior CPU Performance (Octa-Core)
- Exceptional Battery Endurance (108:47h)
- Longer Battery Lifespan (800 cycles)
- No display specifications provided
- Camera specifications unknown
Doogee T10W
- Potentially Lower Price Point
- Simpler CPU Architecture (may be slightly more efficient in *very* light use)
- Compact Design (assumed, based on market segment)
- Inferior CPU Performance (Quad-Core)
- Slow Charging (10W)
- No endurance data provided
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given their price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like resolution, peak brightness, or refresh rate suggests a focus on cost reduction. Users should expect adequate, but not exceptional, visual quality. Further research into panel specifications is recommended before purchase.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks any camera specifications for either device. In this price bracket, camera performance is typically a secondary consideration. Users should anticipate basic camera capabilities suitable for casual snapshots, but not for demanding photography. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It's safe to assume both tablets will feature modest camera systems.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPU configuration. The Oscal Pad 100 boasts an octa-core Unisoc T615, featuring 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration provides a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks compared to the Doogee T10W’s quad-core Unisoc Tiger T310 (1x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The additional cores in the Oscal Pad 100 will translate to smoother app switching, faster loading times, and a more responsive user interface. While the T10W’s single A75 core is clocked slightly higher, it’s outnumbered and outgunned by the T615’s broader architecture. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, suggesting similar power efficiency characteristics, but the T615’s ability to distribute workload across more cores will likely result in better sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Oscal Pad 100’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 108:47 hours. This is a substantial advantage over what we would expect from a tablet with similar specifications. The Doogee T10W, while not providing endurance data, is limited to 10W wired charging. This slower charging speed means longer downtime between uses. The Oscal Pad 100’s longer endurance, coupled with the potential for 800 charge cycles, suggests a longer overall lifespan and reduced need for frequent charging, benefiting users who rely on their tablet throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 100 if you need a tablet for multitasking, extended media consumption, or light gaming, and value long-term battery health. The superior CPU and endurance make it ideal for users who demand consistent performance throughout the day. Buy the Doogee T10W if your primary use case is very basic tasks like reading ebooks or simple web browsing, and you prioritize a lower initial cost over performance and longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T615 in the Oscal Pad 100 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T615 is a capable chipset, demanding games like PUBG Mobile will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. The octa-core configuration provides a better foundation for gaming than the Doogee T10W’s quad-core processor, but it’s not a high-end gaming chip.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Doogee T10W with its 10W charging?
With only 10W charging, the Doogee T10W will take a considerable amount of time to fully charge – likely several hours. This is a significant drawback compared to tablets with faster charging capabilities, and will require planning ahead to ensure the device is ready when you need it.
❓ What does '800 charge cycles' mean for the Oscal Pad 100's battery health?
800 charge cycles indicate the number of times the battery can be fully discharged and recharged before experiencing significant degradation in capacity. This is a strong indicator of long-term battery health and suggests the Oscal Pad 100 will maintain a usable battery capacity for a longer period than tablets with lower cycle ratings.
❓ Is the difference between the CPU cores (A75 and A55) significant for everyday tasks?
Yes, the Cortex-A75 cores are designed for performance, handling demanding tasks more efficiently, while the Cortex-A55 cores prioritize power efficiency for background processes. The Oscal Pad 100’s greater number of both core types will result in a more responsive and smoother experience during multitasking and app usage.
