The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, and the Oscal Pad 10 and Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) represent compelling options for users seeking affordable Android experiences. While both aim to deliver essential functionality, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which tablet offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) with the Snapdragon 680 (or Helio G80) is the better choice. Its more efficient 6nm process and generally faster CPU cores translate to a smoother user experience, despite the Oscal Pad 10’s lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/75 Mbps - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 29 | 2022, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 241.3 x 160 x 8.9 mm (9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 in) | 251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 536 g (1.18 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) - LTE model Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi only model |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) - LTE model Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) - Wi-Fi only model |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 - LTE model Mali-G52 MC2 - Wi-Fi only model |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMCP/uMCP |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | FM radio | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mint Green, Moonlight Silver, Diamond Grey | Storm Grey, Frost Blue |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Oscal Pad 10
- Lower price point makes it highly accessible.
- Adequate for basic tasks like reading and web browsing.
- Potentially longer battery life if equipped with a larger capacity battery (unconfirmed).
- Unisoc T606 chipset struggles with demanding applications.
- Slow 10W charging.
- Unknown display quality.
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
- Faster Snapdragon 680 (or Helio G80) chipset delivers smoother performance.
- 20W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
- Established brand reputation for quality and reliability.
- Higher price compared to the Oscal Pad 10.
- Display quality may not be significantly better than the Oscal Pad 10.
- LTE variant adds to the cost.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed specs like resolution and peak brightness are missing. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus benefits from a more established brand reputation for display quality control. The Oscal Pad 10’s display performance is largely unknown, making the Lenovo a safer bet for color accuracy and viewing angles. Bezels are expected to be similar on both, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both will likely feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots. Detailed sensor information is unavailable, but given the price point, expecting high-quality images is unrealistic. The focus should be on video conferencing capabilities, where both tablets should suffice. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither device prioritizes photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus offers two variants: one with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) and another with the MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, provides a significant efficiency advantage over the Oscal Pad 10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The Snapdragon 680’s Kryo 265 Gold cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, outperform the Unisoc T606’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This translates to faster app launches and smoother multitasking. The Unisoc T606 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications or heavy multitasking. The Wi-Fi only variant of the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus with the Helio G80 will offer a performance level closer to the Oscal Pad 10, but still benefits from Qualcomm’s software optimization.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus gains a clear advantage with its 20W wired charging. The Oscal Pad 10 is limited to 10W charging, meaning significantly longer charging times. While a larger battery capacity on the Oscal Pad 10 could partially offset this, the faster charging of the Lenovo will be more noticeable in daily use. Users who frequently use their tablets will appreciate the convenience of the Lenovo’s quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Pad 10 if you need a basic tablet for light tasks like reading ebooks, browsing the web, and occasional video playback, and your budget is extremely tight. Buy the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and quicker charging, even if it means spending a bit more. The Lenovo is also the better option for users who require LTE connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Oscal Pad 10 struggle with popular games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 is a budget chipset and will likely struggle to run PUBG Mobile smoothly, even on low settings. Expect noticeable frame drops and lag. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus with the Snapdragon 680 will provide a significantly better gaming experience.
❓ Does the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) support expandable storage via microSD card?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, Lenovo tablets typically include a microSD card slot for expandable storage. This is a significant advantage over the Oscal Pad 10, which doesn't mention storage expansion, allowing users to increase storage capacity as needed.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus compared to the 10W charging on the Oscal Pad 10?
The 20W charging on the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus will likely charge the device from 0-100% in approximately 2-3 hours, while the 10W charging on the Oscal Pad 10 could take 4-6 hours or longer. This difference is substantial and will be noticeable for users who frequently need to recharge their tablets.
