The smartphone market is segmented, and these two devices exemplify that. The Oscal Modern 8 aims for extreme affordability, while the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro aggressively targets the upper end of the mid-range with a powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone delivers the best value for different user priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides significantly superior performance, a brighter display, and much faster charging. However, the Oscal Modern 8 remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 9.1 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.36 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, DokeOS 4 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Wisteria Purple, Ripple Blue, Ash Gray | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oscal Modern 8
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially decent battery life due to less powerful chipset
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X6 Pro
- Likely lower quality display
- Slow charging speed
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (1148 nits)
- Fast 67W charging with QC/PD support
- Higher price compared to the Oscal Modern 8
- May require more frequent charging with heavy use
- Camera details are limited in provided data
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, making it easily viewable outdoors. The Oscal Modern 8’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a lower peak brightness and likely a less vibrant experience. While the Oscal Modern 8 may suffice for indoor use, the Poco X6 Pro’s panel offers a superior visual experience, particularly for media consumption and gaming. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro’s camera system is described as capable of both photo and video, but specific sensor details are missing. However, given its positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated setup than the Oscal Modern 8. The Oscal Modern 8’s camera specifications are not detailed, suggesting a basic camera experience. It’s reasonable to assume the Poco X6 Pro will deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, and offer more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) – a feature likely absent on the Oscal Modern 8.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a flagship-adjacent chipset featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-A715 core clocked at 3.35 GHz, alongside three additional Cortex-A715 cores and four efficiency cores. This contrasts sharply with the Oscal Modern 8’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A75 and A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra translates to significantly better power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained peak performance. The Poco X6 Pro will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the Oscal Modern 8 will struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro achieves an impressive 11:46h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life despite its powerful chipset. The Oscal Modern 8’s battery capacity is not specified, but its less demanding chipset suggests it may offer comparable, though likely not superior, battery life. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support, achieving 100% charge in just 45 minutes, is a significant advantage over the Oscal Modern 8’s slower 18W charging. This faster charging dramatically reduces downtime and enhances usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Modern 8 if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You'll accept compromises in performance and features. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding apps, a vibrant display, and fast charging, and are willing to spend more for a significantly improved user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Oscal Modern 8 sufficient for playing games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Oscal Modern 8 can likely *run* PUBG Mobile, the Unisoc Tiger T616 will struggle to deliver a smooth, high-framerate experience, especially on higher graphics settings. Expect significant frame drops and potential lag. The Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra is far better suited for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the Oscal Modern 8 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro can fully charge the device in approximately 45 minutes. The 18W charging on the Oscal Modern 8 will likely take over two hours to reach 100%, representing a significant time saving with the Poco X6 Pro.
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which is known for its improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to manage temperatures effectively and avoid significant throttling, providing sustained performance.
