Oscal Modern 8 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of performance and convenience, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the superior choice. Its significantly faster 68W charging and brighter 1073 nit display, coupled with the more efficient Dimensity 7030 chipset, outweigh the Oscal Modern 8’s lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oscal Modern 8 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 9.1 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.36 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, DokeOS 4 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wisteria Purple, Ripple Blue, Ash Gray | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Oscal Modern 8
- Significantly lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer standby time due to less demanding chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Less powerful processor
- Likely lower display quality
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Fast 68W charging
- Brighter and likely higher-quality display
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Higher price tag
- May require more frequent charging with heavy use
- Potentially less durable build quality (depending on materials)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oscal Modern 8. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Oscal’s panel type isn’t specified, the Edge 40 Neo likely utilizes a higher-quality panel, contributing to better color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of information on the Oscal’s refresh rate suggests it’s likely a standard 60Hz panel, while the Edge 40 Neo’s display is expected to offer a smoother experience with a higher refresh rate (likely 144Hz).
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, given the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and advanced image processing algorithms. The Oscal Modern 8 likely features a more basic camera setup focused on affordability. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the Motorola’s brand reputation suggests a superior photographic experience.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a clear advantage over the Oscal Modern 8’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm). The Dimensity 7030’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, provide a noticeable performance boost over the Oscal’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the Edge 40 Neo is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While both phones utilize a 6x Cortex-A55 configuration at similar clock speeds, the overall system performance will favor the Motorola due to the superior chipset architecture.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of adding 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Oscal Modern 8’s slower 18W charging. While the Edge 40 Neo’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its endurance rating of 80 hours and active use score of 10:28h indicate excellent battery life. The Oscal Modern 8’s battery capacity is also unknown, but its slower charging speed suggests it will take considerably longer to replenish, potentially impacting usability for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Modern 8 if you need a highly affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are willing to compromise on charging speed and display quality. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a smoother user experience, faster charging, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a more capable camera system, even if it means spending more.