The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oscal Flat 2C and Oppo A17k represent two distinct approaches: prioritizing exceptional battery endurance versus aiming for a more responsive user experience. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Oscal Flat 2C is the clear winner, thanks to its impressive 51:18h endurance and 1100 charge cycles. However, those who value a snappier interface and slightly better CPU performance will find the Oppo A17k a more appealing choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2022, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 8x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T603 (22 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 14 (Go edition), DokeOS 4.0 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12 μm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Ripple Blue, Sky Purple | Navy Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2471 |
| Price | - | About 130 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 51:18h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Flat 2C
- Exceptional battery life (51:18h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1100 cycles)
- Potentially more durable due to focus on longevity
- Slower processor compared to the Oppo A17k
- Slow 10W charging speed
- Likely basic camera performance
Oppo A17k
- More powerful processor (Helio G35)
- Faster CPU clock speeds for smoother multitasking
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Likely shorter battery life than the Oscal Flat 2C
- Battery cycle count likely lower
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the lack of display specifications, we can assume both utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but practicality. Bezels are likely substantial on both, and color accuracy will be basic. The real differentiator, if any, will be peak brightness, which is unknown, and PWM dimming frequency – a critical factor for eye strain.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a meaningful comparison is difficult. It’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera systems geared towards casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution. Image processing will likely be heavily reliant on software algorithms to enhance detail and reduce noise, and results will vary significantly depending on lighting conditions. The main sensor’s aperture and size are the key factors, but remain unknown.
Performance
The Oppo A17k’s Mediatek Helio G35, fabricated on a 12nm process, offers a theoretical performance advantage over the Oscal Flat 2C’s Unisoc T603 (22nm). The Helio G35’s CPU configuration – a mix of 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores – provides a higher peak clock speed compared to the Oscal’s uniform 8x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to quicker app loading times and smoother multitasking, particularly for less demanding applications. However, the Unisoc T603’s larger process node suggests potentially higher power consumption, though this is mitigated by the Oscal’s larger battery capacity. The Helio G35’s GPU will also offer a slight edge in gaming, but don’t expect flagship-level performance from either.
Battery Life
This is where the Oscal Flat 2C truly shines. Its reported 51:18h endurance is exceptional for a budget smartphone, significantly outperforming most competitors. The 1100 charge cycles suggest a robust battery designed for long-term reliability. The Oppo A17k’s battery capacity is not specified, but given its focus on performance, it likely prioritizes a smaller battery to keep the device lightweight. The Oscal’s 10W charging is slow, but the extended battery life minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The Oppo A17k’s charging speed is also unknown, but likely similar.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Flat 2C if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from a charger. It’s ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who simply dislikes the anxiety of low battery warnings. Buy the Oppo A17k if you prefer a more responsive experience for everyday tasks like social media browsing and light gaming, and are willing to compromise on ultimate battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc T603 in the Oscal Flat 2C powerful enough for popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram?
Yes, the Unisoc T603 is capable of running social media apps smoothly, although you might experience occasional slowdowns when multitasking or using demanding features within those apps. It’s designed for everyday tasks, and these apps fall within its capabilities.
❓ Will the Oppo A17k struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G35 in the Oppo A17k can handle PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to play at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a playable experience. Expect some stuttering and frame drops, especially during intense action sequences.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Oscal Flat 2C with its 10W charger?
Given the large battery capacity and slow 10W charging, expect a full charge to take approximately 3-4 hours. While slow, the exceptional battery life means you won’t need to charge it as frequently.
❓ Does the Oppo A17k support fast charging, and if so, what wattage?
The charging wattage for the Oppo A17k is not officially specified. However, given its positioning as a budget device, it’s unlikely to support significantly faster charging than the Oscal Flat 2C’s 10W. Expect a similar charging time.
