The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Oscal Flat 2C and Motorola Moto E22s aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Oscal prioritizing battery endurance and the Motorola focusing on a more modern, albeit less efficient, chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto E22s is the better choice. While the Oscal Flat 2C boasts impressive battery life with its 51:18h endurance and 1100 cycles, the Moto E22s’ Helio G37 chipset, built on a smaller 12nm process, offers a noticeable performance advantage in everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2022, October 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 8x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T603 (22 nm) | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 14 (Go edition), DokeOS 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12 μm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Ripple Blue, Sky Purple | Iceberg Blue, Cosmic Black |
| Price | - | About 110 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 51:18h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oscal Flat 2C
- Exceptional battery life (51:18h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1100 cycles)
- Potentially lower operating temperatures due to less powerful chipset
- Slower processor performance
- Less efficient chipset (22nm process)
Motorola Moto E22s
- More powerful processor (Helio G37)
- More efficient chipset (12nm process)
- Faster app loading and multitasking
- Shorter battery life compared to Oscal Flat 2C
- Potential for more noticeable thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details are missing regarding panel type, resolution, or brightness. However, the focus here is on core performance and battery, suggesting both likely utilize budget LCD panels. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, typical for this price bracket. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either device.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Details are lacking regarding sensor sizes and apertures. Given the price point, expect 13MP or similar main sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on the Moto E22s is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely be basic on both, with limited dynamic range and low-light performance. The focus should not be on photography when considering these devices.
Performance
The Motorola Moto E22s holds a clear advantage in processing power. Its MediaTek Helio G37, fabricated on a 12nm process, features an octa-core configuration with a split design: four cores clocked at 2.3 GHz (Cortex-A53) and four at 1.8 GHz (also Cortex-A53). This contrasts with the Oscal Flat 2C’s Unisoc T603 (22nm) with eight Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz. The 12nm process of the Helio G37 is more efficient, translating to better performance per watt. While both use Cortex-A53/A55 cores, the higher clock speeds and process node give the Moto E22s a significant edge in app loading times and multitasking. The Unisoc T603’s larger 22nm node will likely result in higher power consumption for similar tasks.
Battery Life
The Oscal Flat 2C dominates in battery endurance, offering a remarkable 51:18h of usage. This is likely achieved through a combination of a larger battery capacity (unspecified) and the less power-hungry Unisoc T603 chipset. The Moto E22s, while still offering respectable battery life, cannot compete with this figure. Both devices support 10W wired charging, meaning 0-100% charge times will be relatively slow, likely exceeding 3 hours. The Oscal’s longevity is a major selling point for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oscal Flat 2C if you absolutely prioritize battery life above all else and primarily use your phone for basic communication and media consumption. Its 51:18h endurance is exceptional for the price. Buy the Motorola Moto E22s if you value a more responsive user experience, occasional gaming, and a slightly more modern chipset architecture, even if it means sacrificing some battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T603 in the Oscal Flat 2C struggle with modern apps?
The Unisoc T603 is a basic chipset. While it can handle everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media, it may exhibit noticeable lag when running demanding apps or multitasking heavily. Expect longer loading times and occasional stutters.
❓ Is the Helio G37 in the Moto E22s capable of playing popular mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G37 can run PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. Don't expect a high-end gaming experience, but it's capable of casual gaming.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones with the 10W charger?
Both the Oscal Flat 2C and Motorola Moto E22s utilize 10W charging, which is relatively slow. Expect a full charge to take approximately 3 to 4 hours, depending on the battery capacity of each device.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto E22s support software updates?
Motorola typically provides at least one major Android update and a few security patches for its E-series phones. However, update support is not guaranteed to be as extensive as with higher-end Motorola models.
