Orange Neva Jet 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and occasional gaming, the Orange Neva Jet 5G offers a significant advantage thanks to its Snapdragon 855. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G wins for everyday users who value exceptional battery life, incredibly fast 67W charging, and a brighter display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Orange Neva jet 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), MiFavor 9.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 11mm (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 Wireless (Qi) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 900 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.01 W/kg (head) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Orange Neva jet 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Wireless charging (Qi)
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely shorter battery life
- Older chipset architecture
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Incredibly fast 67W charging
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695
- Less powerful processor
- Potentially lower gaming performance
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits, compared to the Orange Neva Jet 5G (brightness data unavailable). This translates to better outdoor visibility. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite (nominal)’ – typical for AMOLED panels – the Neva Jet’s panel characteristics are unknown. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s larger screen size (assumed, based on market positioning) also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G likely benefits from Xiaomi’s established image processing algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The Neva Jet’s older chipset may lack some of the advanced image signal processing features found in newer Snapdragon chips, potentially impacting low-light performance. We can assume the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G will have a more versatile camera system given Xiaomi’s typical offerings.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Orange Neva Jet 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – an octa-core setup with a 2.84 GHz Kryo 485 prime core – compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with its 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 offers better power efficiency, but the 855’s architecture provides a substantial performance lead in CPU-intensive tasks and GPU performance. However, the 695’s efficiency is crucial for battery life. The Neva Jet’s reliance on older LPDDR4X RAM (assumed) versus the Redmi’s likely LPDDR4X or LPDDR5 (market segment dependent) could also impact multitasking performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting comparable battery life *despite* the chipset differences. However, this rating is a composite score. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3) is a game-changer, delivering a 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The Orange Neva Jet 5G’s 18W wired charging (QC4) and Qi wireless charging are significantly slower, making the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G the clear winner for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Orange Neva Jet 5G if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications and older, graphically intensive games, and don't mind potentially shorter battery life. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prefer all-day battery life, rapid charging, and a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and streaming.