Orange Neva Jet 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Detailed Performance and Battery Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and occasional gaming, the Orange Neva Jet 5G is the better choice, despite its older chipset. However, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G wins for all-day battery life and significantly faster 67W charging, making it ideal for mainstream users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Orange Neva jet 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), MiFavor 9.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 11mm (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 Wireless (Qi) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 900 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.01 W/kg (head) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Orange Neva jet 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Wireless charging support (Qi)
- Potentially better image processing
- Slower 18W charging
- Less power-efficient chipset
- Battery life may be shorter than Poco X4 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 67W fast charging (0-100% in 41 minutes)
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695
- Excellent battery endurance (119h)
- Less powerful processor
- No wireless charging
- May struggle with demanding games
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating a high-quality panel. However, specific details like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the Neva Jet's flagship-adjacent chipset, it's reasonable to assume a higher potential for display quality, but without concrete data, this remains speculative. The Poco X4 Pro 5G likely prioritizes power efficiency in its display configuration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. The absence of these specs makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Neva Jet, originating from a brand often associated with imaging, *may* have a slight edge in image processing algorithms. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s camera system is likely tuned for social media sharing and general-purpose photography. Without further information, it's safe to assume both offer adequate, but not exceptional, camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Orange Neva Jet 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – an octa-core setup with a 2.84 GHz Kryo 485 prime core – compared to the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with its 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. The 6nm process of the 695 offers better power efficiency, but the 855’s architectural advantages translate to significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Neva Jet. The 695 is sufficient for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings.
Battery Life
Both devices have an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life *despite* the chipset differences. This is likely due to the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s more efficient Snapdragon 695 and potentially a larger battery capacity (unspecified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Neva Jet 5G offers 18W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) and Qi wireless charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts a blazing-fast 67W wired charging with Power Delivery 3.0 (PD3.0) and Quick Charge 3.0 (QC3). The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, a significant advantage over the Neva Jet’s slower charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Orange Neva Jet 5G if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications and enjoy occasional gaming sessions, and are willing to compromise on battery life. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize all-day battery endurance, rapid charging, and a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and streaming.