Orange Neva Jet 5G vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and potentially benefiting from a lower price point, the Orange Neva Jet 5G is the better choice. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s significantly faster 68W charging and comparable battery endurance make it ideal for those who value convenience and all-day usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Orange Neva jet 5G | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), MiFavor 9.1 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 11mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 Wireless (Qi) | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | - | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 900 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| SAR EU | 1.01 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Orange Neva jet 5G
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 855)
- Potentially lower price point
- Capable of handling demanding tasks
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Older chipset may lack newer features
- Display specs are unknown
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Extremely fast 68W wired charging
- Brighter display (1004 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Less powerful processor than the Neva Jet
- May be more expensive
- Camera quality dependent on software optimization
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Neva Jet. While the Neva Jet’s display specs are missing, the Edge 30 Neo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical OLED panel. The Edge 30 Neo’s display is likely to offer a more vibrant and visible experience in direct sunlight. The absence of refresh rate information for the Neva Jet suggests it may be limited to 60Hz, while the Edge 30 Neo is likely to have a 90Hz or 120Hz panel, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Edge 30 Neo likely benefits from newer image processing algorithms inherent in the Snapdragon 695. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Edge 30 Neo is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. The Neva Jet’s camera performance will heavily rely on its image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 855.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Orange Neva Jet 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm), a flagship-class processor from 2019, featuring an octa-core configuration with a peak clock speed of 2.84 GHz. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo, however, employs the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). While the 6nm process offers better efficiency, the 855’s architecture is significantly more powerful. This translates to superior performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming on the Neva Jet. However, the 6nm process of the 695 should result in better thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load. The Neva Jet’s older chipset may also lack some of the newer connectivity features found in the 695.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in approximately 30-40 minutes. The Orange Neva Jet 5G is limited to 18W charging with Quick Charge 4, resulting in a significantly longer charging time. The Edge 30 Neo also offers 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Neva Jet, providing added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Orange Neva Jet 5G if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and are comfortable with potentially slower charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a sleek, modern design, prioritize extremely fast charging, and value a balanced user experience over peak performance. The Edge 30 Neo is also a better fit for users who frequently use their phone throughout the day and need quick top-ups.